TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | And yet - you still cant or wont an (1) | 12/23/2016 5:04:12 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Unless I missed it - still no answe (2) | 12/23/2016 11:14:37 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Huh...? "Trans-Pacific Aerospace C (4) | 12/22/2016 4:44:07 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | i dont know the answer to your ques (2) | 12/22/2016 12:20:41 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | while i certainly agree that many l (3) | 12/21/2016 12:40:25 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I dont hold 56MM shares and never s (3) | 12/19/2016 6:00:43 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | James - your sarcasm would have sig (3) | 12/19/2016 4:34:59 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | You call me a spin doctor- and a no (4) | 12/17/2016 10:46:07 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | CountryMac - where did I distort th (6) | 12/17/2016 3:15:54 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I didnt see his posts - thanks for (2) | 12/17/2016 11:46:02 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Unlimited shares is never good let (5) | 12/17/2016 8:39:23 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | ragz - how does the below help the (5) | 12/15/2016 10:09:41 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Cajun - so you ask for something an (4) | 12/15/2016 8:46:22 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | tradingjeff - concerning your share (4) | 12/15/2016 12:39:42 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | mag1 - from your post below: i dont (4) | 12/15/2016 12:26:44 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | kmmohr1960 - you continue to call m (5) | 12/15/2016 12:07:02 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | IR has no one to blame but themselv (4) | 12/14/2016 10:29:56 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I too would like to understand the (2) | 12/13/2016 9:23:03 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Huh...? "sure man, but definitely n (1) | 12/13/2016 11:56:06 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Isnt the intent of these boards to (3) | 12/13/2016 11:25:50 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Week or two ago IR said no shares (3) | 12/13/2016 9:43:51 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | "Yep, wait another week and then co (7) | 12/10/2016 8:57:18 AM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | No. The only way you can do that is | 12/06/2016 8:27:46 AM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | Amazon will more than likely be a s (3) | 11/28/2016 2:20:35 PM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | My projections still stand from awh (1) | 11/26/2016 9:29:08 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | There are plenty ofnlong term share (5) | 11/23/2016 2:49:14 PM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | If there was no.value - they wouldn (5) | 11/22/2016 11:26:31 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Is this part of your call for civil (3) | 11/21/2016 9:28:02 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Know better...? "20yrs...he should (2) | 11/21/2016 8:39:23 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | What success is the company experie (3) | 11/20/2016 2:30:38 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | How is that self explanatory...? On (4) | 11/20/2016 12:10:21 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | What ragzz - is below your "proof" (4) | 11/20/2016 7:52:40 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Couole more hard questions for "Jam (4) | 11/18/2016 11:18:00 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | At no time did i ever say i had 56 (9) | 11/18/2016 11:04:19 PM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | I agree. It is a very calculated an | 11/17/2016 11:32:56 PM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | If they really believed HJOE would (9) | 11/17/2016 9:24:10 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Cajun - as a followup - Muse jusg t (3) | 11/15/2016 10:26:26 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Cajun - per your post below: Smalls (3) | 11/15/2016 10:14:14 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | this board is almost a perfect anal (9) | 11/14/2016 1:03:04 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | "Oh, how great would it be to have (4) | 11/14/2016 8:20:04 AM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | I agree. It continues to get toughe (5) | 11/13/2016 11:03:35 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | How is that against TOS? IR is urgi (3) | 11/07/2016 5:49:48 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I only posted on iLie under this sa (3) | 11/07/2016 3:10:04 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Not sure who you are responding to, (2) | 11/07/2016 2:19:55 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | "Think about, this time last year T (6) | 11/07/2016 11:11:25 AM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | One can try and dump "first" on ope (5) | 11/04/2016 2:33:34 PM |
HJOE Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation | first and foremost - the halt is no (5) | 10/31/2016 3:33:55 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | gerrytheb - i agree with your comme (6) | 10/30/2016 11:55:17 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Kramden and others - thanks for the (7) | 10/30/2016 11:42:13 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | no - from this board - 14437. not s | 10/28/2016 12:14:00 PM |