Cajun - so you ask for something and then insult t
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 12/15/2016 8:46:22 AM
Cajun - so you ask for something and then insult the person you are asking? doesnt make a very persuasive argument:
"Smalls,
I have some of the same questions you do, we probably all do. But this leave this alone. STOP-Please stop.
How old are you - 18?"
if you have the same questions - why not ask them of the company/IR? which questions? did you get answers or some financial babble? or - did you NOT ask them because you were scared you would be banned from their lists?
why not ask them on this board and have others provide answers or insights? or were you afraid you would be ostracized, attacked, and then get vile PMs incessantly?
i wont stop asking questions until i get suitable answers. i certainly wont stop holding a group responsible for investor relations when they attack investors. i wont stop defending myself from posters and IR reps that call me a liar and yet can not provide an instance of me lying. why are you not more concerned with the cheerleaders on here that attack posters, accuse them of lying and then disappear when their comments are objectively refuted (ie - with examples/evidence), and refuse to answer or provide opinion on what should be a very simple question: has the company/IR/MRVB started buying back shares?
none of the posters (or IR) that have accused me of lying have yet to back it up. instead, they keep repeating the same lies/accusations over and over in the time honored, progressive tradition of having them become truths over time. none have apologized for the attacks, lies, etc. they are still attacking shareholders via Twitter today.
me, nor any others on this board or Twitter are responsible for the collapse in PPS. we are not responsible for the bloated OS and the never ending conversions that threaten the AS. we are not responsible for making overly speculative PPS predictions and repeatedly affirming them only to arbitrarily dismiss them with NO reasons provided for the major miss (divide 0.01 by 0.0005). we are not responsible for encouraging shareholders to buy while also mocking them for buying an overvalued security.
they have a new Twitter feed specifically for the MRVB traders. great - keep it to that group. that has been suggested before. use the main one for more traditional communication that actually attracts new investors to the company instead of mocking shareholders. they are the face of a publicly traded company (as an IR entity) and they resort to name calling on Twitter. and you ask if I am the one that is 18...?
since IR has been the face, the PPS has been straight down and OS has more than doubled. i dont measure that as success.
so no - i wont stop. i have a large investment in this PUBLIC company and will hold fiduciaries responsible for protecting and enhancing my investment.
"Smalls,
I have some of the same questions you do, we probably all do. But this leave this alone. STOP-Please stop.
How old are you - 18?"
if you have the same questions - why not ask them of the company/IR? which questions? did you get answers or some financial babble? or - did you NOT ask them because you were scared you would be banned from their lists?
why not ask them on this board and have others provide answers or insights? or were you afraid you would be ostracized, attacked, and then get vile PMs incessantly?
i wont stop asking questions until i get suitable answers. i certainly wont stop holding a group responsible for investor relations when they attack investors. i wont stop defending myself from posters and IR reps that call me a liar and yet can not provide an instance of me lying. why are you not more concerned with the cheerleaders on here that attack posters, accuse them of lying and then disappear when their comments are objectively refuted (ie - with examples/evidence), and refuse to answer or provide opinion on what should be a very simple question: has the company/IR/MRVB started buying back shares?
none of the posters (or IR) that have accused me of lying have yet to back it up. instead, they keep repeating the same lies/accusations over and over in the time honored, progressive tradition of having them become truths over time. none have apologized for the attacks, lies, etc. they are still attacking shareholders via Twitter today.
me, nor any others on this board or Twitter are responsible for the collapse in PPS. we are not responsible for the bloated OS and the never ending conversions that threaten the AS. we are not responsible for making overly speculative PPS predictions and repeatedly affirming them only to arbitrarily dismiss them with NO reasons provided for the major miss (divide 0.01 by 0.0005). we are not responsible for encouraging shareholders to buy while also mocking them for buying an overvalued security.
they have a new Twitter feed specifically for the MRVB traders. great - keep it to that group. that has been suggested before. use the main one for more traditional communication that actually attracts new investors to the company instead of mocking shareholders. they are the face of a publicly traded company (as an IR entity) and they resort to name calling on Twitter. and you ask if I am the one that is 18...?
since IR has been the face, the PPS has been straight down and OS has more than doubled. i dont measure that as success.
so no - i wont stop. i have a large investment in this PUBLIC company and will hold fiduciaries responsible for protecting and enhancing my investment.
(4)
(2)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼