At no time did i ever say i had 56 MM shares. An
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 11/18/2016 11:04:19 PM
At no time did i ever say i had 56 MM shares.
Another one of your blatant misrepresentations. Isnt surprising since you keep claiming I am different people. Eventually you will get it right. However, i did buy all my shares and they werent for "services rendered."
Spawns...? That may hold weight if one could provide any evidence to support. On the other hand, if one checks your posts, emails, tweets - then it becomes more likely which one is actually using the multiple aliases.
Tell "James" he may need to retreat to his safespace with puppies and coloring books if he cant stand the criticism. After the rampant boasting, missed projections, petulant behavior, unprofessional manners, and immediately labeling everyone with real concerns or questions a "basher" - the ruse is being seen through. Much like the race card, one can only play the basher card so often before it loses its power.
When you speak to "him" - ask him about that share buyback offer you said I would have in 2 weeks. And ask him about the YE PPS prediction he vehemently affirmed a mere two weeks prior to the abrupt reversal. Oh right- they are just the messenger. If that is so - ask them the "hard" question of how the company missed the target by several orders of magnitude... lilbirdy had it right about missing decimals. Real IR groups address shareholdera on such an egregious miss and give specifics on why the target was missed. Here...nothing. just a new target even higher and pushed out even further where culpability gets even more diluted (pun intended).
More are seeing through the IR BS and understanding the dilution for what it is. Further, more are starting to realize the "agenda" boogeyman doesnt exist. Investors bought into it in the low 30s, 20s, high teens, low teens, and around 10. They are through. This is ALL on IR. It is a direct result of their treatment to shareholders and those with questions on email/twitter.
More are also seeing through the BS on this board. The villification of those with concerns and the venomous private messages.
So - when does Bill step in and take back the face of rhe company or does he let them continue to rake his name/rep through the muck?
Another one of your blatant misrepresentations. Isnt surprising since you keep claiming I am different people. Eventually you will get it right. However, i did buy all my shares and they werent for "services rendered."
Spawns...? That may hold weight if one could provide any evidence to support. On the other hand, if one checks your posts, emails, tweets - then it becomes more likely which one is actually using the multiple aliases.
Tell "James" he may need to retreat to his safespace with puppies and coloring books if he cant stand the criticism. After the rampant boasting, missed projections, petulant behavior, unprofessional manners, and immediately labeling everyone with real concerns or questions a "basher" - the ruse is being seen through. Much like the race card, one can only play the basher card so often before it loses its power.
When you speak to "him" - ask him about that share buyback offer you said I would have in 2 weeks. And ask him about the YE PPS prediction he vehemently affirmed a mere two weeks prior to the abrupt reversal. Oh right- they are just the messenger. If that is so - ask them the "hard" question of how the company missed the target by several orders of magnitude... lilbirdy had it right about missing decimals. Real IR groups address shareholdera on such an egregious miss and give specifics on why the target was missed. Here...nothing. just a new target even higher and pushed out even further where culpability gets even more diluted (pun intended).
More are seeing through the IR BS and understanding the dilution for what it is. Further, more are starting to realize the "agenda" boogeyman doesnt exist. Investors bought into it in the low 30s, 20s, high teens, low teens, and around 10. They are through. This is ALL on IR. It is a direct result of their treatment to shareholders and those with questions on email/twitter.
More are also seeing through the BS on this board. The villification of those with concerns and the venomous private messages.
So - when does Bill step in and take back the face of rhe company or does he let them continue to rake his name/rep through the muck?
(9)
(3)