How is that self explanatory...? Once again Rag
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 11/20/2016 12:10:21 PM
Re: Ragz2Richez #15291
How is that self explanatory...?
Once again Ragz - i was quoting another poster's claim that i had 56MM. I never did. That came from this board and several posters took it to be truth - just like Washington agendas. Repeat the lie or half truth often enough and it becomes "fact" in the minds of the public.
Again - show me where I claimed Inhad 56 MM shares - not where someone else claimed I said it or me referencing their claim.
You will be looking a long time. It doesnt exist. Just like the statement about me claiming to be a 20+ year trader. I said i have been investing for 20+ years. I also, several times, explained the specific differences.
The focus should be on IR/company and the constant selling, dilution (OS increasing and reaching critical AS limit), and why they kept re affirming the $0.01 YE PPS target and then backed off with no explanation why they failed to meet it or more pertinently (since year isn't over) why they no longer think they will.) Instead - a small group on here has diverted the attention to "shiny things " and the boogeyman instead of having investors and shareholders discussing a very critical and public target miss. IR retweeted affirmation of target a mere 2 weeks (or so) prior to it being dismissed. Why? Where was the disconnect? Why the change?
Once again Ragz - i was quoting another poster's claim that i had 56MM. I never did. That came from this board and several posters took it to be truth - just like Washington agendas. Repeat the lie or half truth often enough and it becomes "fact" in the minds of the public.
Again - show me where I claimed Inhad 56 MM shares - not where someone else claimed I said it or me referencing their claim.
You will be looking a long time. It doesnt exist. Just like the statement about me claiming to be a 20+ year trader. I said i have been investing for 20+ years. I also, several times, explained the specific differences.
The focus should be on IR/company and the constant selling, dilution (OS increasing and reaching critical AS limit), and why they kept re affirming the $0.01 YE PPS target and then backed off with no explanation why they failed to meet it or more pertinently (since year isn't over) why they no longer think they will.) Instead - a small group on here has diverted the attention to "shiny things " and the boogeyman instead of having investors and shareholders discussing a very critical and public target miss. IR retweeted affirmation of target a mere 2 weeks (or so) prior to it being dismissed. Why? Where was the disconnect? Why the change?
(4)
(3)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼