Home ›
Stock Message Boards ›
Stock Boards ›
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Message Board

Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc IPIX

Board Mod: Dynabolic

Asst Mods: Kelt Drano NotRichYet2 Loose Lips someconcerns Mo

Last Post: 08/20/2025 6:04:49 AM

Board Marks: 278

Posts Today: 0

Board Views Today: 699

Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc. (IPIX)

Company Website: http://www.ipharminc.com/

IPIX Stock Message Board Intro

Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (OTCMRKTS: IPIX) Stock Message Board

Create New Post View All Posts Board Mark Banned

Post

Subject

Author

Posted On

64595	Yesterdays PR was terrific. Brilacidin was found (15)	farrell	05/20/2020 8:55:40 PM
70679	IPIX .. NR (non retail) would normally be showing (16)	4kids	10/28/2021 12:32:05 PM
72046	Innovation Pharmaceuticals Announces Publication (7)	Mo	10/04/2022 12:13:17 PM
72181	WAKEFIELD, MA / January 4, 2023 BT (7)	Drano	01/09/2023 8:51:41 AM
28132	It's a proof of concept. You always start small,	Drano	10/10/2016 9:12:14 AM
28131	Goes without saying we wish they had a lot more (1)	NotRichYet2	10/10/2016 9:06:38 AM
28130	Since it should be preserved and may be deleted (5)	someconcerns	10/10/2016 9:02:58 AM
28129	It's great that " 2 of 4 patients achieved full (2)	Drano	10/10/2016 8:54:34 AM
28128	Awesome news! Take that shorts!!! Go (1)	AlanC	10/10/2016 8:33:36 AM
28127	Update: Cellceutix Phase 2 Trial Initial Data (3)	daydreaming2	10/10/2016 8:05:52 AM
28126	https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160 (2)	rosalieone	10/10/2016 4:04:02 AM
28125	I would like to think that at least most	someconcerns	10/09/2016 6:35:26 PM
28124	I read about weight loss.	grotty	10/09/2016 6:19:56 PM
28123	In a fast food society like ours . depending on	NotRichYet2	10/09/2016 5:54:33 PM
28122	I recall an article declaring a possible link	Dynabolic	10/09/2016 5:45:20 PM
28121	I read about weight loss.	grotty	10/09/2016 5:41:07 PM
28120	Question on KEVETRIN . I know and have seen	NotRichYet2	10/09/2016 4:50:14 PM
28119	Would think investors in OTHER BIO stocks who are (1)	NotRichYet2	10/09/2016 4:41:38 PM
28118	I think they pasted some new opening paragraphs	Drano	10/09/2016 3:36:28 PM
28117	Exactly, and it would also be utterly unethical.	Drano	10/09/2016 3:35:51 PM
28116	Nothing new in this article	grotty	10/09/2016 1:25:40 PM
28115	Who would subject themselves to a trial with the	grotty	10/09/2016 1:16:00 PM
28114	Why the BS about needing control groups in cancer (1)	Drano	10/09/2016 12:18:03 PM
28113	Yes I'm familiar with the patent process as I too	Kelt	10/09/2016 11:08:58 AM
28112	I'm not saying they didn't have costs.I am saying	Kelt	10/09/2016 10:56:38 AM
28111	No, CTIX did have significant costs -- typically (3)	Drano	10/09/2016 10:29:23 AM
28110	In Re: ; (3) the significant costs incurred by (3)	Kelt	10/09/2016 10:12:43 AM
28108	I think we'll get an update on the first cohort (1)	sox0407	10/08/2016 8:36:59 PM
28107	LR read your post and all the replies. I'm 100%	sox0407	10/08/2016 7:06:09 PM
28106	Well, I finally had the chance to sit and read (8)	someconcerns	10/08/2016 5:50:51 PM
28104	I think we're going to have to start referring to	Drano	10/08/2016 3:58:18 PM
28103	The Muppets are not going to like that	incubus	10/08/2016 3:50:52 PM
28102	I 'second' that definition.	incubus	10/08/2016 3:48:44 PM
28101	That is why I like seeing comparisons of PRURISOL (1)	NotRichYet2	10/08/2016 1:39:04 PM
28100	The points brought up were the company steps. NOW (1)	NotRichYet2	10/08/2016 1:34:49 PM
28099	Much excitement about an injected eczema drug	Drano	10/08/2016 1:15:44 PM
28098	Yes. Many steps in between	grotty	10/08/2016 1:05:33 PM
28097	Believe you left out the eventual stock uplisting (1)	NotRichYet2	10/08/2016 12:44:07 PM
28096	Anyone interested in AVXL, I posted part of an	Drano	10/08/2016 12:25:44 PM
28095	Believe Dr. B was talking about partnerships (1)	incubus	10/08/2016 12:24:11 PM
28094	I ran across a term that is the correct one for	Drano	10/08/2016 12:08:23 PM
28093	I thought the market was open Monday but trades	Drano	10/08/2016 11:25:39 AM
28092	Forgot. GO CTIX!	grotty	10/08/2016 11:24:45 AM
28091	Everyone be has a different definition of (3)	grotty	10/08/2016 11:23:22 AM
28090	From Sullivan filing: "The reasonable (2)	incubus	10/08/2016 11:21:59 AM
28089	On a brighter note,obviously Sullivan/Ashcroft (6)	Kelt	10/08/2016 10:16:47 AM
28088	Hopefully Sullivan/Ashcroft has enough	AlanC	10/08/2016 10:10:05 AM
28087	I agree that Sullivan/Ashcroft needs to be on (2)	AlanC	10/08/2016 10:06:07 AM
28086	I noticed that as well... "This part seems new. (1)	thefamilyman	10/08/2016 10:03:48 AM
28085	Alan, in a perfect world you are right. The cost	grotty	10/08/2016 9:27:56 AM
28084	Agree with the desire here that a counter suit (1)	NotRichYet2	10/08/2016 9:02:41 AM
28083	I hope you are wrong in your assumption that this (3)	AlanC	10/08/2016 8:09:01 AM
28082	This part seems new. ". . . and was required to	F1ash	10/07/2016 10:57:59 PM
28080	I am on board for a class action lawsuit against (7)	daydreaming2	10/07/2016 8:56:20 PM