| Top 50 Most Viewed Posts This Month |
|---|
|
Today This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
|
1. Katangolo: This is profound. Thank you for sharing this (578)  (1) |
| 2. HHIGambler: Item 8.01 Other Events. On November 23, 2025, (514) (6) |
| 3. Ramjet: Before a partnership occurs, they'll want (494) (11) |
| 4. z_smith01: ~ 3% dilution. Expensive, but probably worth it (494) (1) |
| 5. Mr3Putt: Lawsuit settled - didn't see that one coming! (490) (11) |
| 6. Jake2212: misui: you are a great physician and poster on (484) (32) |
| 7. misiu143: With 16 M payment , I am afraid more lawyers (484) (2) |
| 8. hoops: I may be reading too much into the PR. However, (455) (10) |
| 9. Ramjet: These two statements and phrases in bold from the (393) (7) |
| 10. misiu143: Jake , you are absolutely right , this is why I (392) (11) |
| 11. WUM: Link From another board: CCR5 Modulation as a (363) (5) |
| 12. Plotinus: Jake: Great reply. General question on (344) (7) |
| 13. Jake2212: Plotinus: My license to practice law expired (338) (9) |
| 14. Respert24: Great questions. I believe based on the (333) (10) |
| 15. Katangolo: Craig, you know as well as anyone that “class (322) (11) |
| 16. Ramjet: You and I are thinking the same thing. Agreed (322) |
| 17. Katangolo: Great question — and it’s an important (321) (6) |
| 18. KCRoyal2004: misiu, a $16M "settlement" with shareholders (316) (5) |
| 19. MIM-104: These 3 people of Nader Pourhassan, Michael (314) (5) |
| 20. JimmyO: Postal lady, many of us greatly appreciate your (313) (8) |
| 21. twinter11: I posted two relevant excerpts from that paper a (311) (4) |
| 22. mountaineer: I agree. I do not think that is his sole reason (309) (4) |
| 23. docj: Thanks for the observation Jake. What about the (307) (2) |
| 24. craigakess: Hi misiu. Unless someone opted out of the class (299) (3) |
| 25. mikeyt1818: I eagerly await the big photo ops that Doc will (296) (5) |
| 26. Emmitt: Not an attorney, but wouldn't this settlement be (295) (1) |
| 27. MIM-104: Lead Plaintiff Brian Joe Courter and Courter and (295) |
| 28. Jake2212: I believe the plaintiffs' lawyer is Bradley (288) (3) |
| 29. Jake2212: docj: Sadly, dealing with frivolous class action (286) (5) |
| 30. misiu143: I have the same opinion about these shareholders (285) (5) |
| 31. cardamine: Excellent, enlightening analogy for those of us (283) (4) |
| 32. misiu143: Yes it is not very high penetration , if I (281) |
| 33. twinter11: "CNS penetration refers to a substance's ability (281) |
| 34. misiu143: Yes , I am hanging on this word " partners " also (279) (5) |
| 35. Katangolo: Thank you, Card. I taught high school biology for (279) (4) |
| 36. misiu143: I am not sure my answer was what you were asking (276) (4) |
| 37. Plotinus: Very well put Kat…seasoned and reasoned (275) (2) |
| 38. twinter11: OHM, Can we remove this from the "down regulator" (272) (1) |
| 39. twinter11: "Although maraviroc exerts immunomodulatory (268) (3) |
| 40. misiu143: Twinter, Central Nervous System ( CNS ) --is the (266) (1) |
| 41. cardamine: Interesting point re use of newly authorized (266) (3) |
| 42. misiu143: Marviroc is passing BBB , not perfect but it is. (261) (2) |
| 43. twinter11: Ok So Maraviroc has problems passing the BBB AND (258) (1) |
| 44. Figgs: In some instances, the claims are filed with the (258) (1) |
| 45. My69z: Like ICI's, these other 4 industries could too be (258) (1) |
| 46. KCRoyal2004: Emmitt, E&O insurance would not cover (251) (1) |
| 47. sean007: IF you go to their website...the CellSieve (251) (10) |
| 48. postal lady: I would really like to see the link for the (246) (4) |
| 49. nelsonsjavaheads: Thx Jake I'll be looking for any contact from (242) (2) |
| 50. My69z: 3 yrs ago -- ICI Agreement with major institution (241) (8) |
