Home ›
Stock Message Boards ›
Stock Boards ›
Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation (HJOE) Message Board

Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation HJOE

Board Mod: X10

Asst Mods: casey7883

Last Post: 03/14/2024 10:08:07 PM

Board Marks: 143

Posts Today: 0

Board Views Today: 357

THE BOARD WILL BE UPDATED SOON

UNDER CONSTRUCTION...... VISIT BACK FOR UPDATES.....

HANGOVER JOE'S IS CURRENTLY SETTLING FINANCIAL MATTER AND IS DELISTED. THIS PAGE WILL BE UPDATED AS WE MOVE CLOSER TO THEIR RETURN TO TRADING. STAY TUNED.........

Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation (OTCMRKTS: HJOE) Stock Message Board

Create New Post View All Posts Board Mark Banned

Post

Subject

Author

Posted On

13862	Matt Veal 2018 address to shareholders. Keep the (1)	Goodspeed65	01/01/2018 2:53:27 PM
13987	Hangover Joe's Supplemental address to	Goodspeed65	01/03/2018 5:05:21 PM
15018	Joe may be down and out at the moment, but I have	Goodspeed65	03/01/2019 7:36:17 PM
6666	Most definitely Casey, that has been my	Thundersteel_03	06/20/2016 10:08:57 AM
6665	It ran to almost .01 last year carrying the stop	casey7883	06/20/2016 10:02:27 AM
6664	I'm not sure it was you who stated it, but with	Goodspeed65	06/20/2016 9:58:34 AM
6663	Agree 100%..up up and away... say goodbye to sub	Thundersteel_03	06/20/2016 9:15:36 AM
6662	No stop sign. Simple as that. Away it (2)	Goodspeed65	06/19/2016 11:27:25 PM
6661	What will it take to wake this	Steve Rogers	06/19/2016 11:07:02 PM
6660	Yes it will..!	X10	06/19/2016 8:42:41 PM
6659	HJOE=A Sleeping Giant. watch what happens when it (1)	Thundersteel_03	06/19/2016 8:25:57 PM
6658	fantastic analysis. You really hit that post out	Thundersteel_03	06/19/2016 6:28:24 PM
6657	Word	Steve Rogers	06/19/2016 6:26:42 PM
6656	Good thing the company isn't watching the grass	casey7883	06/19/2016 6:22:53 PM
6655	or water boil...lol	BUMPERCARS	06/19/2016 5:29:07 PM
6654	We will see on June 30th what KBM thinks of HJOE	Steve Rogers	06/19/2016 5:25:03 PM
6653	Aside from Caseys Case presentation indicating	BUMPERCARS	06/19/2016 5:22:43 PM
6652	No I wouldnt, and to tell you the truth I'm (2)	Coujoe62	06/19/2016 3:32:59 PM
6651	Even if there's the slightest possibility of jail	casey7883	06/19/2016 3:19:18 PM
6650	Usury Penalties A lender that knowingly collects	casey7883	06/19/2016 3:04:10 PM
6649	The language of the statute is mandatory, leaves (1)	Coujoe62	06/19/2016 2:51:24 PM
6648	http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts (1)	casey7883	06/19/2016 2:33:27 PM
6647	I don't think it'll even get close to that. It	Goodspeed65	06/19/2016 2:04:48 PM
6646	Happy Father's Day to all the fathers (2)	X10	06/19/2016 12:24:46 PM
6645	Yep.	X10	06/19/2016 12:24:02 PM
6644	It's a legal case , it could be settled tomorrow	jacknjillio	06/19/2016 12:12:46 PM
6643	So I guess what I'm hearing from everyone today	X10	06/19/2016 12:08:16 PM
6642	In an already crazy story, that would just be	jacknjillio	06/19/2016 11:58:25 AM
6641	To me a lot depends on how the judge decides to	casey7883	06/19/2016 11:42:38 AM
6640	That freaking guy, been talking about po boxes	jacknjillio	06/19/2016 11:26:13 AM
6639	Maybe if the judge was found to have a conflict (2)	urexposer44	06/19/2016 11:13:43 AM
6638	I understand how things could go wrong in a court	Coujoe62	06/19/2016 10:59:15 AM
6637	Looks like they're talking about street addresses	Goodspeed65	06/19/2016 10:50:08 AM
6636	"Help me understand why if I'm wrong. I'm in (1)	thesmalls	06/19/2016 10:06:06 AM
6635	Maybe KBM decided to add a night shift. Since the	casey7883	06/19/2016 9:13:22 AM
6634	Could be, of course this just might all be a (3)	casey7883	06/19/2016 6:58:27 AM
6633	Locke based on the times that post I was (1)	Coujoe62	06/19/2016 6:50:05 AM
6632	How do you know its going to trial Locke? You (1)	urexposer44	06/19/2016 12:36:08 AM
6631	The rulings on usuary cases in New York vary	casey7883	06/19/2016 12:13:49 AM
6630	If they're illegal then the judge will rule that	Locke	06/19/2016 12:04:52 AM
6629	No but you seem to be getting them confused. The	casey7883	06/18/2016 11:28:40 PM
6628	All of that is illegal. Why would anyone think	Locke	06/18/2016 11:21:09 PM
6627	All legal according to him. Funny how some people (1)	Coujoe62	06/18/2016 11:06:46 PM
6626	Posted By: Locke Re: Coujoe62 #6570 "I'm for (1)	casey7883	06/18/2016 10:50:01 PM
6625	http://www.schlamstone.com/personal-guaranty-unen	casey7883	06/18/2016 10:15:14 PM
6624	http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts (1)	casey7883	06/18/2016 9:29:49 PM
6623	Ok thanks	X10	06/18/2016 9:26:07 PM
6622	I'm not in law either, but I think KBM will stick (2)	Goodspeed65	06/18/2016 8:22:57 PM
6621	I think it all depends on the information that (1)	X10	06/18/2016 7:45:53 PM
6620	No X, I don't. I think KBM will seek summary in (4)	Goodspeed65	06/18/2016 3:58:41 PM
6619	I think there is no chance KBM allows themselves (5)	jacknjillio	06/18/2016 3:51:30 PM
6618	Yes but my money would be on cruise industry for	X10	06/18/2016 3:47:51 PM
6617	So you don't think summary will be	X10	06/18/2016 3:47:03 PM