Alan, thanks for the kind words! You should know b

Alan, thanks for the kind words! You should know by now that I have no problem with you posting the #s daily and my opinion on the added statement. I won’t debate again whether it’ll scare away new investors, but I can say for certain that it won’t attract them. No long-term investor is going to say “wow 54% of the volume was short, I’m going to invest in this company”.

You think naked shorts have to cover when CTIX uplists to Nasdaq but they don’t have to cover when CTIX changed its name. I disagree because the CUSIP # changes in both cases. I provided reasons why I think they have to cover when CTIX became IPIX in this post.

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4883530

One way to stick it to the shorts is to find more buyers. A new investor is likely to tell his/her family and friends about this stock. I’m sure most of us have done the same. Word of mouth is a powerful marketing strategy. Current longs have pretty much reached their buying limit in IPIX, otherwise a 10K ask at 70 cents wouldn’t stay there for hours.

Again, my daily response isn’t to question your integrity. Its sole purpose is to tell new investors “maybe the shorting isn’t as bad as your statement indicates so come invest”.