Trans-Pacific Aerospace C TPAC
Posted On: 06/14/2017 10:35:16 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (1)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19118
That's simple. You said the company had been involved in pumps. That's a lie. Then you said that was your opinion. That was another lie. You never stated it as an opinion. There was no equivocation. You also told me in our first conversation, when I was trying to help you that you would lay low for a few days. That was another lie. You have been a problem from the beginning and continue to be. Your ego demands that you prove to yourself that you know best, and this type of person is never wrong and always blind. I'm not going to engage with you any longer. You're a waste of my time. Have a nice life
Posted On: 06/13/2017 10:56:00 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (1)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19106
So if I point out that you're lying, which you were and are, that's cherry picking? Here's a couple of thoughts. Tell the truth and keep your messages short. Nobody is as interested in your epistles as you may think they are. And for the record, the IR firm does not use our domain. tpacbearings.com is the property of and used by TPAC and I don't recall TPAC press releases listing them as our IR firm. But here I go cherry picking. You were problematic from the first phone call and wouldn't listen and I see nothing has changed. At least you're consistent.
Posted On: 06/13/2017 9:17:14 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (3)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19098
You claim that the company has had multiple pumps. So now not only are you wrong, you are a liar. The company has never, and I repeat NEVER had a pump. First of all, they are highly unethical and secondly, they are illegal. So now it's clear that you're absolutely full of it.
Posted On: 05/16/2017 12:51:31 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (0)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19007
Do you really think I have any interest in reading your self-serving novel? The company isn't being run the way you'd like. You're smarter than anyone and everyone out there. That's what this boils down to. I tried to be helpful to you and was respectful to you. Not to insult engineers, but you're the stereotypical bad engineer. You know everything and nobody can tell you differently. So I won't read your treatise but will respect your right to blather incessantly. You're rather good at it. Gibberish is something you have elevated to an art form. Happy for you!
Posted On: 05/12/2017 8:36:24 PM
Post# of 19821
Replies (5)
Posted By: wrmckay
I would like to correct something. I did receive a screenshot from Carson in September, 2016. He claims it was from his account and based on the "handle" it may be. I did not request it and actually made no comment about it when it was sent. I have had two phone conversations with him and exchanged text messages six times, the last time being in early December, 2016. He has constantly asked for inside information and when I refused to provide it to him he would post in a public forum in order to try to make the information public, even though it was made clear to him that the information he was requesting would not be made public. I've bent over backwards with this guy, but his arrogance and self-righteousness is a bit too much to bear. While I understand that shareholders have legitimate concerns regarding their investments, that does not give them the right to browbeat me, threaten me, tell me what the law is or otherwise annoy me and then completely misrepresent the relationship and discussions we have had.
Posted On: 05/12/2017 11:53:17 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (0)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: #
Let's get something straight here, Carson. I never had a heated discussion with you regarding what James may or may not have said. I was pissed off when you couldn't wait 2-3 days so I could help you, but I did not have the heated discussion you described. That sir is a lie. Furthermore, and other shareholders will back this up, I have never, and I mean never asked anyone to prove to me that they were a shareholder and have never doubted anyone who has contended that they were. I never questioned you as to whether you were a shareholder or not, so your claims are either poor recollection, or total fabrications. Furthermore, I made it clear to you, as I have done to many other shareholders, that IR and Muse are independent of TPAC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. So when they make an assertion regarding PPS or other aspects of the business or whether the Cubs will repeat, those are their assertions and may or may not coincide with the views of the company.
As I said previously, here are the facts. You asked me to do you a favor. I told you I would. I asked you to shut up for 2-3 days so I could help you. You started yapping within about 45 minutes. Those are the facts. Your ego demands that you spew, even when it's not in your best interest. I'm not going to engage with you any longer. And by the way, I have no recollection of you sending me a screenshot and no email showing one. I'm not saying you didn't do it, but I will tell you, that if you offered it I am 100% sure I would have told you I didn't need to see it for you to prove you were a shareholder. I don't ask for that type of stuff. So while you may have sent it, and again I don't recall seeing it, I can guarantee that I never asked you for it.
Posted On: 06/14/2017 10:35:16 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (1)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19118
That's simple. You said the company had been involved in pumps. That's a lie. Then you said that was your opinion. That was another lie. You never stated it as an opinion. There was no equivocation. You also told me in our first conversation, when I was trying to help you that you would lay low for a few days. That was another lie. You have been a problem from the beginning and continue to be. Your ego demands that you prove to yourself that you know best, and this type of person is never wrong and always blind. I'm not going to engage with you any longer. You're a waste of my time. Have a nice life
Posted On: 06/13/2017 10:56:00 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (1)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19106
So if I point out that you're lying, which you were and are, that's cherry picking? Here's a couple of thoughts. Tell the truth and keep your messages short. Nobody is as interested in your epistles as you may think they are. And for the record, the IR firm does not use our domain. tpacbearings.com is the property of and used by TPAC and I don't recall TPAC press releases listing them as our IR firm. But here I go cherry picking. You were problematic from the first phone call and wouldn't listen and I see nothing has changed. At least you're consistent.
Posted On: 06/13/2017 9:17:14 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (3)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19098
You claim that the company has had multiple pumps. So now not only are you wrong, you are a liar. The company has never, and I repeat NEVER had a pump. First of all, they are highly unethical and secondly, they are illegal. So now it's clear that you're absolutely full of it.
Posted On: 05/16/2017 12:51:31 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (0)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: thesmalls #19007
Do you really think I have any interest in reading your self-serving novel? The company isn't being run the way you'd like. You're smarter than anyone and everyone out there. That's what this boils down to. I tried to be helpful to you and was respectful to you. Not to insult engineers, but you're the stereotypical bad engineer. You know everything and nobody can tell you differently. So I won't read your treatise but will respect your right to blather incessantly. You're rather good at it. Gibberish is something you have elevated to an art form. Happy for you!
Posted On: 05/12/2017 8:36:24 PM
Post# of 19821
Replies (5)
Posted By: wrmckay
I would like to correct something. I did receive a screenshot from Carson in September, 2016. He claims it was from his account and based on the "handle" it may be. I did not request it and actually made no comment about it when it was sent. I have had two phone conversations with him and exchanged text messages six times, the last time being in early December, 2016. He has constantly asked for inside information and when I refused to provide it to him he would post in a public forum in order to try to make the information public, even though it was made clear to him that the information he was requesting would not be made public. I've bent over backwards with this guy, but his arrogance and self-righteousness is a bit too much to bear. While I understand that shareholders have legitimate concerns regarding their investments, that does not give them the right to browbeat me, threaten me, tell me what the law is or otherwise annoy me and then completely misrepresent the relationship and discussions we have had.
Posted On: 05/12/2017 11:53:17 AM
Post# of 19821
Replies (0)
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: #
Let's get something straight here, Carson. I never had a heated discussion with you regarding what James may or may not have said. I was pissed off when you couldn't wait 2-3 days so I could help you, but I did not have the heated discussion you described. That sir is a lie. Furthermore, and other shareholders will back this up, I have never, and I mean never asked anyone to prove to me that they were a shareholder and have never doubted anyone who has contended that they were. I never questioned you as to whether you were a shareholder or not, so your claims are either poor recollection, or total fabrications. Furthermore, I made it clear to you, as I have done to many other shareholders, that IR and Muse are independent of TPAC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. So when they make an assertion regarding PPS or other aspects of the business or whether the Cubs will repeat, those are their assertions and may or may not coincide with the views of the company.
As I said previously, here are the facts. You asked me to do you a favor. I told you I would. I asked you to shut up for 2-3 days so I could help you. You started yapping within about 45 minutes. Those are the facts. Your ego demands that you spew, even when it's not in your best interest. I'm not going to engage with you any longer. And by the way, I have no recollection of you sending me a screenshot and no email showing one. I'm not saying you didn't do it, but I will tell you, that if you offered it I am 100% sure I would have told you I didn't need to see it for you to prove you were a shareholder. I don't ask for that type of stuff. So while you may have sent it, and again I don't recall seeing it, I can guarantee that I never asked you for it.
2
