I noticed you didnt include any of my direct repli
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 349)
Posted On: 11/11/2017 1:34:22 PM
Re: Ragz2Richez #19822
I noticed you didnt include any of my direct replies to Bill's posts. Why not...? That's right -most of them were deleted immediately after I posted.
Lay low - after i spoke with Bill- I received two inflammatory emails from James going over the EXACT things I discussed with Bill. It appeared the two of them had just got spoken and james was responding to their conversation. I explained that to Bill with the timeline of the emails compared to our conversations. He wasn't happy but accepted the reasoning and my apology.
Pump? Thats laughable. When the entire premise is laid out with what is known and then filling in the blanks (not to mention I said it could easily be construed as a P&D) does one really need to equivocate and say it is just their opinion...?
Bill never took the time to put mt post history into context. That is convenient for him as it doesnt fit the narrative. He accused me of acting like a friend like other bashers only only to throw him under the bus. That is BS and once again - my post history consistently proves it. I was constantly ridiculed here for believing in Bill vs the SEC filings and defending him while the IR/SI group mocked those on here and Twitter for investing in a theoretically insolvent company. They mocked Bill indirectly (and sometimes directly) for running it into the ground.
Bill did not correct the record with James. You nor anyone else can refute that and that is the cusp of the legal argument. Instead you redirect, call names, have posts deleted.
I never lied to Bill in person nor on this board and NO ONE has been able to prove otherwise after numerous and repeated claims. Not about being a shareholder, shares held, claims I supposedly made, etc. The record on this board will absolutely speak for itself in court as will the emails , tweets, and text messages if it comes to that. I am more than ready to let them stand on record. The company and, IR/SI are thenones with gaping holes, shareholder attacks, and misinformation to explain.
Lay low - after i spoke with Bill- I received two inflammatory emails from James going over the EXACT things I discussed with Bill. It appeared the two of them had just got spoken and james was responding to their conversation. I explained that to Bill with the timeline of the emails compared to our conversations. He wasn't happy but accepted the reasoning and my apology.
Pump? Thats laughable. When the entire premise is laid out with what is known and then filling in the blanks (not to mention I said it could easily be construed as a P&D) does one really need to equivocate and say it is just their opinion...?
Bill never took the time to put mt post history into context. That is convenient for him as it doesnt fit the narrative. He accused me of acting like a friend like other bashers only only to throw him under the bus. That is BS and once again - my post history consistently proves it. I was constantly ridiculed here for believing in Bill vs the SEC filings and defending him while the IR/SI group mocked those on here and Twitter for investing in a theoretically insolvent company. They mocked Bill indirectly (and sometimes directly) for running it into the ground.
Bill did not correct the record with James. You nor anyone else can refute that and that is the cusp of the legal argument. Instead you redirect, call names, have posts deleted.
I never lied to Bill in person nor on this board and NO ONE has been able to prove otherwise after numerous and repeated claims. Not about being a shareholder, shares held, claims I supposedly made, etc. The record on this board will absolutely speak for itself in court as will the emails , tweets, and text messages if it comes to that. I am more than ready to let them stand on record. The company and, IR/SI are thenones with gaping holes, shareholder attacks, and misinformation to explain.
(1)
(1)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼