yes, you see my point now. I am saying that in the
Post# of 15187
when they have maxed out pps wise, say at .20-.30 that they will
need to do it cause their revenue will be growing exponentially
higher, yet the pps wont be able to accommodate that.
I am also in agreement that, with you, that a share buy back program is needed and in the best case scenario for us and the company. Because, that will allow the company and shareholders to keep a good percentage of their holdings, while allowing our investment to
grow with revenues.
Again, if they can get shares bought & down to say 1.2 billion share-1 billion and only take 1/3 of the retail float out. 66 % percent of your holdings and make it .70-.90 cents with only 300 million retail float, on a major exchange,getting coverage, and having small cap funds pile in and move this on news..hmmm
The big thing to remember here is:WHEN THE R/S happens, the company will be on a HUGE revenue upswing. The small float will allow this to get to $10,$15,$20 over dollars, depending on market share. R/S works if you bring it in whn revenues are accelerating at a rapid pace. That would benefit us greatly, at that time. Other companies r/s cause they need money. This is the complete opposite case.
This is way in the future and in a perfect world I would take a 100% percent buyback and keep all my shares. I would love that. Im just giving scenarios of how things would shake out as. Wouldn't take place till .20-.30
TS