The only person you've talked about is Obama. That

Quote:

---

The only person you've talked about is Obama. That's the subject matter. You mention his name in every post you've made. So naturally we're talking about him. What an absolutely ignorant comment to make. Do you know that I'm a Libertarian? Do you know what that is?

---

Of course I know what that is. You don't apply your Libertarian scalpel to Republican presidents. It is ONLY Obama who get's sliced up by the criteria that can be equally applied to Republicans. That's partisan.

Quote:

---

Nobody 'lives' on food stamps.

You're disconnected from reality. Millions live on food stamps. You provide several examples of people living on food stamps. Any proof to any of it? You make a habit of requiring proof yet supplying none yourself.

---

Nobody lives well on food stamps, that's the sense I was trying to convey, unsuccessfully apparently, as my subsequent examples showed.

Few would choose to take SNAP if they could do better.

Quote:

---

Neither one of them created new jobs. If I have $1 and you come along and take it, then later turn around and hand me $1. You cannot claim you created a new dollar bill for me. You simply gave back what you took in the first place. This is the basics of logical thinking and it blows my mind that you exhibit none whatsoever.

---

It's the basis of a simple literalist mind.

You're 'a dollar taken a dollar given back' doesn't even make sense from a basic math standpoint.

Nobody gets as much in unemployment as they made to qualify for it and it does end. And very few of re-employed do not earn more than what they received from unemployment benefits. If there really were no new jobs created than how would GDP increase? It certainly contracted when 700K jobs/month were being lost.

But let's play your game and stipulate that neither Bush nor Obama created 'new jobs'. However, both B. Clinton and Obama had far, far 'less awful' records on new jobs than did GWB.