Email exchanges with Craig Huffman. Somehow I am suppose to understand in Huffman's one response that this is an invitation from Kyle to come to Tampa and to call him a liar to his face. Yet I initiated the conversation. I told the person I spoke with Craig could call me, but he never did. This person stated I was giving Craig a lot of problems in the current lawsuit. Kyle was never mentioned, which is why I sent Craig the email, not Kyle.
Why didn't Craig just forward the email to Kyle so Kyle could invite me himself? I don't speak in KODES. Is SFRX using board posters to try and convey some sort of message after telling the Court they don't follow the boards because they know of no other "libelous posts" about the company from anyone other than the Defendant.
Do I worry them that much? Or are they afraid the family owned loan shark business is going to suffer because of my appearance here and elsewhere?
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:10 PM
subject: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
I spoke with XXXX **** recently, and apparently you wanted some help from him resolving some issues we have between us.
I would think you know full well those issues revolve around TEXX, but I understood you believe they revolve around SFRX.
Would you care to explain what those issues are and what you think it would take to resolve them?
Regards
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:22 PM
subject: Re: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
I take it by your lack of response you have no issues with me in regards to SFRX.
Also note that you never responded when I asked you to describe in detail any and all false information you once suggested I was posting about SFRX when you threatened some sort of legal action.
I take it that our differences remain with TEXX.
Regards,
from: craig@securuslawgroup.com
to: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
cc: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:11 PM
subject: RE: Resolving our differences
Mr.SCM,
I apologize for the delay, but is has been about than a day for a response, however, I believe that your interest in getting to the bottom of differences you see between your own views on some matters and my representation of certain companies, would be helpful to all involved.
I would have refrain from setting forth issues that you may have made on message board as to Seafarer Exploration due to ongoing litigation, and am not authorized to disclose anything. Your relationship with $17MM Man is of course of interest, but since we have him pinned to a trial date on damages he caused and a date for a motion for contempt, we are concentrating on that. I am not going to go into such matters.
That being said, Seafarer has a rather open and honest management who would like to open up an invitation to you, as they have for so many others, that you could come to visit, not just in Tampa, but other actual locals, and actually understand the truth of which you want to parse out materials. Everything needs context, and since Seafarer does not readily put out PR's in any continuous fashion like some companies, and exists without doing many things that $17MM Man thinks are occurring, having the chance to understand the Company first had could be beneficial. We could arrange that.
We do have the issues with TEXX, but I can not go into such issues, as you made certain accusations on such toward me which places me into a difficult position. However, I have no further involvement with the Company as you would know.
If you would like, for good faith reasons to arrange for a meeting with Seafarer, then that can be arranged. We can continue discussions as you would like on these matters.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:38 PM
subject: Re: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
What exactly is it that SFRX wishes to discuss with me in person? What is it SFRX thinks I need to understand, and how could it be beneficial? And who exactly would it be beneficial to?
I'm not following you. I understood you had an issue with me regarding SFRX. I still am not clear as to what that issue is.
Now why hasn't Huffman responded. How is it board posters knew about the (ahem) invitation and "allegedly" know what Kyle wants from me when Kyle has NEVER said that to me?
The only invite I know about is the one asking me to leave this board. I respectfully decline.
Last word on this until I get an invitation from Kyle personally.
Why didn't Craig just forward the email to Kyle so Kyle could invite me himself? I don't speak in KODES. Is SFRX using board posters to try and convey some sort of message after telling the Court they don't follow the boards because they know of no other "libelous posts" about the company from anyone other than the Defendant.
Do I worry them that much? Or are they afraid the family owned loan shark business is going to suffer because of my appearance here and elsewhere?
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:10 PM
subject: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
I spoke with XXXX **** recently, and apparently you wanted some help from him resolving some issues we have between us.
I would think you know full well those issues revolve around TEXX, but I understood you believe they revolve around SFRX.
Would you care to explain what those issues are and what you think it would take to resolve them?
Regards
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:22 PM
subject: Re: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
I take it by your lack of response you have no issues with me in regards to SFRX.
Also note that you never responded when I asked you to describe in detail any and all false information you once suggested I was posting about SFRX when you threatened some sort of legal action.
I take it that our differences remain with TEXX.
Regards,
from: craig@securuslawgroup.com
to: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
cc: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:11 PM
subject: RE: Resolving our differences
Mr.SCM,
I apologize for the delay, but is has been about than a day for a response, however, I believe that your interest in getting to the bottom of differences you see between your own views on some matters and my representation of certain companies, would be helpful to all involved.
I would have refrain from setting forth issues that you may have made on message board as to Seafarer Exploration due to ongoing litigation, and am not authorized to disclose anything. Your relationship with $17MM Man is of course of interest, but since we have him pinned to a trial date on damages he caused and a date for a motion for contempt, we are concentrating on that. I am not going to go into such matters.
That being said, Seafarer has a rather open and honest management who would like to open up an invitation to you, as they have for so many others, that you could come to visit, not just in Tampa, but other actual locals, and actually understand the truth of which you want to parse out materials. Everything needs context, and since Seafarer does not readily put out PR's in any continuous fashion like some companies, and exists without doing many things that $17MM Man thinks are occurring, having the chance to understand the Company first had could be beneficial. We could arrange that.
We do have the issues with TEXX, but I can not go into such issues, as you made certain accusations on such toward me which places me into a difficult position. However, I have no further involvement with the Company as you would know.
If you would like, for good faith reasons to arrange for a meeting with Seafarer, then that can be arranged. We can continue discussions as you would like on these matters.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
from: <smallcapsmarket@gmail.com>
to: craig@securuslawgroup.com
date: Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:38 PM
subject: Re: Resolving our differences
Mr. Huffman,
What exactly is it that SFRX wishes to discuss with me in person? What is it SFRX thinks I need to understand, and how could it be beneficial? And who exactly would it be beneficial to?
I'm not following you. I understood you had an issue with me regarding SFRX. I still am not clear as to what that issue is.
Now why hasn't Huffman responded. How is it board posters knew about the (ahem) invitation and "allegedly" know what Kyle wants from me when Kyle has NEVER said that to me?
The only invite I know about is the one asking me to leave this board. I respectfully decline.
Last word on this until I get an invitation from Kyle personally.
