SFRX lies to the Court via Craig Huffman in their response.
NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY REQUESTS
Plaintiff, Seafarer Exploration, through the undersigned attorney, hereby files this notice of compliance with the Defendant’s discovery requests. After final service of the request for production and interrogatories, the Plaintiff, Seafarer Exploration, worked to gather such materials and information over the last three weeks. Due to the Chief Executive Officer being unavailable on Company projects, the final submission of materials was not completed until June 20, 2015 for the request for production. However, the interrogatories were completed and submitted on or before June 18, 2015. The Defendants submissions were not received until June 4, 2015.
At this point the liability for the Defendants actions has been subject to a finding of liability for libel on both counts as per the stipulation he entered and the Court Order. He is subject to a continued injunction against his actions of posting messages and communications about the Company, and associated persons.
At this point the Plaintiff is ready for trial on the damages aspect only. Any evidence which the Defendant seeks to submit will be as to damages only at trial. No further discovery is needed from the Defendant by the Plaintiff.
AND STATUS OF CASE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that this Notice of Compliance and Case Status was served via email to $17MM Man at the email of 17mmman@verizon.net on June 22, 2015,
/s/ Craig A. Huffman
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Email from Huffman to Defendant about the Interrogatories last November.
Monday, November 17, 2014 3:58 PM
$17MM Man,
I take it by your service of interrogatories and request for production that you are now waiving the 60 day period of abeyance that the Court graciously allowed you in order to find counsel to represent you. Such was not part of the announced Court Order, and your doing so is not in conformity with her Order as announced and agreed to by all parties at the last hearing. As the Court had ordered the abeyance, we are at a loss as to why you sent these matters. If you were wishing to proceed with the case pro se (representing yourself) then you should not be filing for continuances as you did and asking for the time to gain counsel, which was granted.
As such, we will be submitting the Court Order that you do not agree with the version sent to you. I am attaching the motion for punitive damages again, which we will be pursuing in the case with a hearing for such filing. We will not be supplying you with exhibit A at this time, nor responding to your discovery requests given the interim of the 60 day period which was ordered as an abeyance of action.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
Judge Cook ORDERED SFRX to Respond to this last January, but Craig and Kyle LIED to the Court recently saying they never got the request until June.
11/21/2014 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
11/21/2014 REQUEST TO PRODUCE
11/21/2014 INTERROGATORIES
01/08/2015 ORDER ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERRGOTORIES AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO PRODUCE..................GRANTED........01/06/15 MJC
Waiting on that invitation Kyle.
NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY REQUESTS
Plaintiff, Seafarer Exploration, through the undersigned attorney, hereby files this notice of compliance with the Defendant’s discovery requests. After final service of the request for production and interrogatories, the Plaintiff, Seafarer Exploration, worked to gather such materials and information over the last three weeks. Due to the Chief Executive Officer being unavailable on Company projects, the final submission of materials was not completed until June 20, 2015 for the request for production. However, the interrogatories were completed and submitted on or before June 18, 2015. The Defendants submissions were not received until June 4, 2015.
At this point the liability for the Defendants actions has been subject to a finding of liability for libel on both counts as per the stipulation he entered and the Court Order. He is subject to a continued injunction against his actions of posting messages and communications about the Company, and associated persons.
At this point the Plaintiff is ready for trial on the damages aspect only. Any evidence which the Defendant seeks to submit will be as to damages only at trial. No further discovery is needed from the Defendant by the Plaintiff.
AND STATUS OF CASE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that this Notice of Compliance and Case Status was served via email to $17MM Man at the email of 17mmman@verizon.net on June 22, 2015,
/s/ Craig A. Huffman
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Email from Huffman to Defendant about the Interrogatories last November.
Monday, November 17, 2014 3:58 PM
$17MM Man,
I take it by your service of interrogatories and request for production that you are now waiving the 60 day period of abeyance that the Court graciously allowed you in order to find counsel to represent you. Such was not part of the announced Court Order, and your doing so is not in conformity with her Order as announced and agreed to by all parties at the last hearing. As the Court had ordered the abeyance, we are at a loss as to why you sent these matters. If you were wishing to proceed with the case pro se (representing yourself) then you should not be filing for continuances as you did and asking for the time to gain counsel, which was granted.
As such, we will be submitting the Court Order that you do not agree with the version sent to you. I am attaching the motion for punitive damages again, which we will be pursuing in the case with a hearing for such filing. We will not be supplying you with exhibit A at this time, nor responding to your discovery requests given the interim of the 60 day period which was ordered as an abeyance of action.
Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com
Judge Cook ORDERED SFRX to Respond to this last January, but Craig and Kyle LIED to the Court recently saying they never got the request until June.
11/21/2014 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
11/21/2014 REQUEST TO PRODUCE
11/21/2014 INTERROGATORIES
01/08/2015 ORDER ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERRGOTORIES AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO PRODUCE..................GRANTED........01/06/15 MJC
Waiting on that invitation Kyle.
