Ha - so basically 4 months to revise manuals that
Post# of 41413
Ha - so basically 4 months to revise manuals that many would say that was only a few changes, but then some key guy was out for a couple of weeks, but then more changes, and more review... Every two weeks the 3 areas seem to need to get on one page.. the breeze blows and throws them off track? is there not anyone strong enough to keep this thing moving and executing?
Honestly - this is getting slightly ridiculous, if this is true... You all can bash MIT all you want, You can say just because I sit here slightly incredulous that I am a basher, I am not, but to sit there and not look at the big picture is foolish.... You can see why not everyone takes what Baltia says as gospel, yet gets trounced for it. In the end the skeptics are more right than the juice drinkers. Sigh......... (Ok - I let that out.)
Frustrating... Frankly - as far as been mentioned, there has been no training the last 3 months, so what revisions have needed to been made? That was supposed to be Dec/Jan... this is now MARCH.... and all of this on the bet that the April plane check finds ZERO structural problems...
LT - Just throw it out there... Go ahead, Russia is not going to get the opportunity to approve until August... Lets hope the actual schedule is more aggressive - much more....