Posted On: 09/30/2013 12:12:24 PM
Post# of 5066
Re: BigCheezie #3467
He wasn't responsible for the patent expiration (as much as I would love to blame him for that) though he was pretty daft for not confirming the 15 or 20 year protection was due to expire. I think he is capitalizing on that major faux pas, though.
The additional info required by the FDA is not something that he would be handling--that is information that will be submitted by Dr. Ichim and/or Dr. Min. And the additional info has nothing to do with whether or not the submission was done right the first time. It's additional info that is required because the FDA are covering all plausible issues. This could be a result of issues that have presented from other trials by other companies using similar approaches. Again, regardless of what so-called "docs" on the other board might say, this is business as usual for the FDA. This matter is no big deal in my opinion. The doctors know what they are doing.
The additional info required by the FDA is not something that he would be handling--that is information that will be submitted by Dr. Ichim and/or Dr. Min. And the additional info has nothing to do with whether or not the submission was done right the first time. It's additional info that is required because the FDA are covering all plausible issues. This could be a result of issues that have presented from other trials by other companies using similar approaches. Again, regardless of what so-called "docs" on the other board might say, this is business as usual for the FDA. This matter is no big deal in my opinion. The doctors know what they are doing.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
