(Total Views: 574)
Posted On: 02/14/2021 2:30:23 PM
Post# of 154119
Re: Borel Fields #77898
If I am reading Borel's summary correctly:
** 36 cases provided a p-value less than .01 (highly, highly positive; clear win)
** 1 case provide a p-value between .01 and .05 (good enough to win)
** 2 cases provided p-values greater than .05 (thanks for playing, but now we need to look at secondary endpoints and try to tell a story).
I'm not saying this is a pumper's board, but I think I will say that it is a wildly optimistic board! Or, perhaps a well-studied, highly informed and smarter than just about anybody board!
GLTA.
** 36 cases provided a p-value less than .01 (highly, highly positive; clear win)
** 1 case provide a p-value between .01 and .05 (good enough to win)
** 2 cases provided p-values greater than .05 (thanks for playing, but now we need to look at secondary endpoints and try to tell a story).
I'm not saying this is a pumper's board, but I think I will say that it is a wildly optimistic board! Or, perhaps a well-studied, highly informed and smarter than just about anybody board!
GLTA.
(6)
(0)
