TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Agreed. Well-writtten post and inci (2) | 05/04/2016 11:45:21 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I agree. No appreciable movement up (5) | 05/04/2016 11:22:29 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Well said. Thank you. Civil discour (2) | 05/04/2016 11:16:12 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Way ahead of you my friend. :) Been | 05/04/2016 10:27:52 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I'm here. Just digesting and trying (6) | 05/04/2016 10:18:04 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | We'll see what the PR says. We've a (5) | 05/04/2016 12:13:14 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Good work. Interested to hear their | 05/03/2016 3:41:21 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I think what's holding this back is (2) | 05/03/2016 3:29:12 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I think much of what we're seeing i (7) | 05/03/2016 12:01:47 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I agree...an after-hours PR release (3) | 05/03/2016 10:55:33 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Well said, TT! I agree. I think in (5) | 05/03/2016 10:54:28 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Absolutely! Again, I'm more cautiou (2) | 05/02/2016 6:26:58 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | That's the one! Thank you! I mis-re (2) | 05/02/2016 6:22:09 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | tradingjeff --I had the same questi (4) | 05/02/2016 3:58:00 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I'm thinking licensing, as I don't (2) | 05/02/2016 2:00:23 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I agree... I like to manage expecta (2) | 05/02/2016 11:18:05 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I hope it's something truly HUGE, b (5) | 05/02/2016 11:03:09 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Hopefully China, but could also be (4) | 05/02/2016 10:59:56 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Quite the interesting email and twe (4) | 05/01/2016 3:26:53 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | This morning (in Tweets & Replies): (2) | 04/29/2016 10:41:24 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | From the April 26 tweet: IR Focus f (1) | 04/29/2016 10:39:27 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Given IR's tweet yesterday, I'd say (3) | 04/29/2016 10:20:34 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | The problem is that the president n (1) | 04/29/2016 1:03:56 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I'm guessing Shelby will allow it t (2) | 04/28/2016 5:22:47 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I think to be "approved for submiss (3) | 04/28/2016 3:47:16 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Here's the take-away: The latest ch (1) | 04/28/2016 3:28:08 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Full Text of the WSJ article: Ex-Im | 04/28/2016 3:27:10 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | It is exactly as I suspected: http: (1) | 04/28/2016 3:23:56 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | EX-IM opposition: I believe the key (4) | 04/28/2016 3:20:27 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Response from IRT, re: MRVB: Greeti (4) | 04/28/2016 3:10:47 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Thanks for the info. I've never joi (2) | 04/28/2016 2:07:18 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I did email them, but no response y | 04/28/2016 2:02:41 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Do you like them better than Clay T | 04/28/2016 2:01:53 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Hear, hear! I second that, and woul (5) | 04/28/2016 1:03:16 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Haha...not a chance. I want details (3) | 04/28/2016 12:45:39 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | As requested by TPACmuse, I've sent (4) | 04/28/2016 12:34:30 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | LOI info from Wikipedia (excerpted) (4) | 04/28/2016 12:07:45 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Now I see the reason for possible p (8) | 04/28/2016 12:04:05 PM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Absolutely agree, DJ. I'm the same. (5) | 04/28/2016 11:50:46 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Nice response, TT. Thanks! (2) | 04/28/2016 11:36:59 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | DJ -- every OTC company has friends (2) | 04/28/2016 11:31:10 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Nice explanation. I think you may b (2) | 04/28/2016 11:26:47 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | If it is conversion of preferred sh (1) | 04/28/2016 11:24:37 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Mysterium -- Maybe I'm missing some (3) | 04/28/2016 11:17:33 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I agree... 90% of the time, I think (1) | 04/28/2016 11:13:07 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | No clue. I've asked them to explain (2) | 04/28/2016 11:11:28 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | My problem with the mention of dilu | 04/28/2016 11:10:42 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | I did...before posting here. No res | 04/28/2016 11:03:04 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Yes, I'm well aware that pretty muc (5) | 04/28/2016 10:50:31 AM |
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace | Love the re-seller/licensing fees i (2) | 04/28/2016 10:20:36 AM |