coolnapz, that was one of the best posts concernin

coolnapz, that was one of the best posts concerning Treaty I've read in a long time.  I've never taken a step back to understand the philosophy behind some of these PR's.  To confirm your theory; Mike M. told me in different words the same .  He told me that the July 31st Shelby PR was purposely written in a style for the bears.   Much of the listed milestones are being worked but to state "closing this week" might have only been for the bears.  Treaty wants investors and not traders.  I suppose if they lose some shareholders along the way due to a bit of exaggeration in their PR's then that is better than the bears taking the PPS to .005.  I am frustrated by the phrase "soon" or "this week" but Treaty does need to beat the bears i.e. "the playground bully" at their own game.  I have consoled my expectations of Treaty's timing of milestones.  I agree that if it takes to early next year for the 1000 BOPD vs this past June then so be it. I would rather see that then .005/share due to the lack of aggressive PR's.  Treaty will get there eventually.