This post just deleted from HUB. How is this off t
Post# of 39368
Posted On: 05/24/2013 2:12:41 PM
This post just deleted from HUB. How is this off topic. Arstegall is correct. He's like taking candy form a baby when you has to go defensive.
Removed By: IH Admin Reason: Off-Topic | Send PM To kanola Previous | Next
Posted by: kanola
In reply to: tdbowieknife who wrote msg# 57457 Date: 5/24/2013 2:06:39 PM
Post # 57464 of 57466
[quote]Again, it says in the 10-K "all current and future Texas leases". That makes it pretty clear to me...
[/quote] lmao
tdbowieknife Date:5/20/2013 2:44:00 PM Post #56974
[quote]Need something in a PR or SEC filing. Treaty's word means nothing.
[/quote]
tdbowieknife Friday, February 01, 2013 Post # of 50267
[quote]For Treaty to hit oil in commercial quantities with the first well in a new exploration area where oil has not yet been found and without doing seismic would be extremely rare. You would need to be extremely lucky. Not saying it can't happen but the odds would be very thin, and almost unheard of.[/quote]
You still say there that there is no oil, even though they filed ( 2 ) 8 K's, and even have said there is a possibility.
______________
tdbowieknife 4/24/2013 11:38:42 PM Post #54748
[quote]The TRRC is on the heals of Treaty in Texas, though it could take into June for the P-5 to be officially revoked or delinquent. Apparently it goes to the enforcement commission about now and will be officially toast by the end of June. The good guys always give the bad guys the benefit of...
[/quote]
Treaty continues as of this day. 1st it was May 1, Than June, now they convene in July. Maybe next it could be 2016 ??
__________________________
tdbowieknife Tuesday, May 21, 2013 Post # of 57393
[quote]I know that Treaty did make a agreement to do road improvements and run some electric, and there was
also something about supplying some computers. But I have not seen the actual agreements.[/quote]
Is this FACT , or OPINION ????? Just like the TEXAS issue. With out something substantial it's just opinion. Dies not matter how people see it. It's what is on an agreement, which according to you, Treaty does not file so therefore one has not been seen. It is said above that you only trust something in writing from Treaty.
Once again, I'm a bit confused.
Removed By: IH Admin Reason: Off-Topic | Send PM To kanola Previous | Next
Posted by: kanola
In reply to: tdbowieknife who wrote msg# 57457 Date: 5/24/2013 2:06:39 PM
Post # 57464 of 57466
[quote]Again, it says in the 10-K "all current and future Texas leases". That makes it pretty clear to me...
[/quote] lmao
tdbowieknife Date:5/20/2013 2:44:00 PM Post #56974
[quote]Need something in a PR or SEC filing. Treaty's word means nothing.
[/quote]
tdbowieknife Friday, February 01, 2013 Post # of 50267
[quote]For Treaty to hit oil in commercial quantities with the first well in a new exploration area where oil has not yet been found and without doing seismic would be extremely rare. You would need to be extremely lucky. Not saying it can't happen but the odds would be very thin, and almost unheard of.[/quote]
You still say there that there is no oil, even though they filed ( 2 ) 8 K's, and even have said there is a possibility.
______________
tdbowieknife 4/24/2013 11:38:42 PM Post #54748
[quote]The TRRC is on the heals of Treaty in Texas, though it could take into June for the P-5 to be officially revoked or delinquent. Apparently it goes to the enforcement commission about now and will be officially toast by the end of June. The good guys always give the bad guys the benefit of...
[/quote]
Treaty continues as of this day. 1st it was May 1, Than June, now they convene in July. Maybe next it could be 2016 ??
__________________________
tdbowieknife Tuesday, May 21, 2013 Post # of 57393
[quote]I know that Treaty did make a agreement to do road improvements and run some electric, and there was
also something about supplying some computers. But I have not seen the actual agreements.[/quote]
Is this FACT , or OPINION ????? Just like the TEXAS issue. With out something substantial it's just opinion. Dies not matter how people see it. It's what is on an agreement, which according to you, Treaty does not file so therefore one has not been seen. It is said above that you only trust something in writing from Treaty.
Once again, I'm a bit confused.
(0)
(0)Treaty Energy Corporation (TECO) Stock Research Links
I expose those connected to Hedge Funds and Illegal NSS to help protect penny stocks from their vicious attacks trying to BK the company for the benefit of HEDGE FUNDS. I've received NO compensation in any form for such, except for a few thank yous...