I'm new to the board. That said, I've been Long si

I'm new to the board. That said, I've been Long since 2020 and have a family member who could really benefit from this miracle molecule, so I have a vested interest.

Most of the people on this board probably know someone, a family member or relative, who could benefit from LL as well. And those who are short sellers may one day need this drug or have a loved one who might. They should think about that.

If you believe Ohm at all, and I do, then you know the drug is worth more than the share price suggests. It's just a matter of when the market realizes this.

So, no, I don't have an agenda other than (1) to get the drug to market as soon as possible to help as many people as possible (2) and to earn a decent return on my investment. I feel so strongly about number (1) that I would even give up a return if it meant the drug could be brought to market.

As far as Numbers (1) and (2) above go, which are my agenda, I would add that short selling makes it more difficult for our company to get funding. For. that reason, I think it is morally wrong to short sell certain types of products because it can deny them funding and because people's lives are at stake: These include life-saving drugs, hospitals, food companies, etc. There are in fact countries that ban short selling in their markets. Most noteworthy, our own country banned short selling financial stocks (and even some non-financial stocks) during the financial crisis of 2008. They should ban short selling permanently for biomedical companies, especially startups, who can't easily get funding from other sources.

Still accumulating shares, staying long, and supporting Dr J