Wait...what? "Lawyers don't necessarily follow th
Post# of 147658
NO ONE says law is absolute because everyone knows that is isn't, as we use the qualifications of "beyond a reasonable doubt" and "preponderance of the evidence", depending on the case at hand. Of course those are not absolutes. No argument there, my friend.
Contracts are not broken, the appropriate word is BREACHED and if Amarex breached, which we strongly believe that they did, that is one thing. HOWEVER finding gross negligence and/or willful misconduct is a second part to that. There can be the former without the latter.
This isn't political, it's a very simple breach of contract case with an extra component, PLUS this is being arbitrated, not played out in a courtroom, and that is a very different animal. A judge/jury must apply the law to the best of their ability to the above mentioned standards. An arbitrator isn't under quite the same standards.
You and I are not at war here, we are all on the same team in the end....team CYDY.