Agreed. A reverse split is a bad idea. Financial
Post# of 148181
We just need CA to put some points on the board - by points, I mean some positive, tangible development, whether that be the hold being lifted, a partnership, or maybe some other development that we're not thinking about. While on the one hand I generally like more info - I'm good with him staying silent until something "real" can be communicated - unlike NP who release rapid fire PRs on everything from starting a new trial, to a paper being submitted, etc. - 99% of which never amounted to anything.
Let's go CA - get us something real - my kids need new pairs of shoes for Christmas!