September 9, 2021. FB Me: Do you see any potent
Post# of 36567
(Total Views: 535)
Posted On: 02/17/2022 2:41:23 PM
September 9, 2021. FB
Me: Do you see any potential for the Novovax NVX-CoV2373 vaccine?
Joe: Rich Steffens not for long term memory no, again all full spike protein vaccines are worthless and give the same 1791 antibodies, they just deliver it through Moth cells.
Me: Joseph Moscato thanks, that makes sense. Plus, the Matrix-M adjuvant from tree bark certainly doesn’t sound like it would help generate a more potent immune response as compared to your chosen one from 3M.
Joe: Rich Steffens no but again do you really want to add adjuvant to 1791 non Neutralizing antibodies, I would of thought they would of separated the 9 Neutralizers then the adjuvant makes them much more potent and robust hence why you use adjuvant, remember the reason why you use adjuvant is you can only get 1000 micrograms of vaccine (protein) in one injection any more balls up and does not dissipate into the body from the injection site, and typically you want that 1000 microgram potency but let’s say you use 5 epitopes in a vaccine then it’s 200 micrograms per which makes pretty weak components, adding adjuvant will bring their potency up to 1000 each in that single shot as a comparative you will have 5000 microgram potency with the max 1000 injection administration, hope that makes sense.
So imagine the full spike protein for Covid has approx 287 epitopes, potency for the neutralizing epitopes that make the 9 neutralizing antibodies is very low verses the remaining majority of epitopes that make the 1791 non Nuetralizers (the bad guys) giving you a far greater chance to get the wrong messages which create off targets.
As I’ve stated from day one if their were 1791 good guys verses 9 bad guys, slam dunk vaccine as far as safety even without long term memory which you still wouldn’t have, but getting yearly shots who cares, but unfortunately it’s the other way around, hence why I consider full spike mRNA vaccines poison and long term I’m afraid will be the next big big problem.
Me: Joseph Moscato very informative information, Joe. Thanks!
Me: Do you see any potential for the Novovax NVX-CoV2373 vaccine?
Joe: Rich Steffens not for long term memory no, again all full spike protein vaccines are worthless and give the same 1791 antibodies, they just deliver it through Moth cells.
Me: Joseph Moscato thanks, that makes sense. Plus, the Matrix-M adjuvant from tree bark certainly doesn’t sound like it would help generate a more potent immune response as compared to your chosen one from 3M.
Joe: Rich Steffens no but again do you really want to add adjuvant to 1791 non Neutralizing antibodies, I would of thought they would of separated the 9 Neutralizers then the adjuvant makes them much more potent and robust hence why you use adjuvant, remember the reason why you use adjuvant is you can only get 1000 micrograms of vaccine (protein) in one injection any more balls up and does not dissipate into the body from the injection site, and typically you want that 1000 microgram potency but let’s say you use 5 epitopes in a vaccine then it’s 200 micrograms per which makes pretty weak components, adding adjuvant will bring their potency up to 1000 each in that single shot as a comparative you will have 5000 microgram potency with the max 1000 injection administration, hope that makes sense.
So imagine the full spike protein for Covid has approx 287 epitopes, potency for the neutralizing epitopes that make the 9 neutralizing antibodies is very low verses the remaining majority of epitopes that make the 1791 non Nuetralizers (the bad guys) giving you a far greater chance to get the wrong messages which create off targets.
As I’ve stated from day one if their were 1791 good guys verses 9 bad guys, slam dunk vaccine as far as safety even without long term memory which you still wouldn’t have, but getting yearly shots who cares, but unfortunately it’s the other way around, hence why I consider full spike mRNA vaccines poison and long term I’m afraid will be the next big big problem.
Me: Joseph Moscato very informative information, Joe. Thanks!
(7)
(0)