Scientists and engineers think in terms of probabi

Scientists and engineers think in terms of probabilites, rarely if ever thinking in terms of or making.... absolute statements. My position has now creeped up to believing in about an 86% probability that the FDA's integrity is "compromiseable" and has been compromised with vaccines, with leronlimab, probably also with RLFTF and HGEN, and Ivermectin.

As a retired analytical chemist and instructor, I will say I've been very concerned about the vaccine trials since they began. The 44,000 folks in the Phizer trial, seems like a large number, but the number of vaccinated folks who became infected, I think it was 8, yes it was 8, critically used data point of 8, (I just found the abstract) so 8 people and the FDA grants a broad EUA resulting in a couple billion folks on the globe getting jabbed. Long term side effects? Minimized side effects? Poor collection of side effects data? My main criticism is the inability of this trial to adere to any reasonable facsimile of "The Scientific Method", because the "uncontrolled variables" were absolutely massive, eg patient behavior patterns, social activities, attitudes toward the virus in general (casual vs frightened), their employment environments and many more.
Doses of Leronlimab, 2 vs 4 in CD12? The famous negative FDA letter on Leronlimab? If a drug is clearly safe, a P value should not take precedence over the possibility of saving lives? Sorry, I could go on for months.....our antecdotal data, eIND data, CD10, CD12, Dr Patterson at Ted Talks...???.Filipino Dr stating that "all of the results" with Leronlimab have been very positive...????
The movie on HULU "Dopesick" (Oxycontin) if exaggerated, well, I support their exaggeration because a major point must be broadcasted, that money is very very powerful!