Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Message Board

"Fourth, he may only file with the SEC. They can d

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 448)
Posted On: 10/20/2021 7:07:10 AM
Avatar
Posted By: microcaps
Re: Becky HE #8657
"Fourth, he may only file with the SEC. They can do it and they don't have to sell using the OTC. My thought on this one is that they maybe waiting for the University results ad well as sales on the current product return to pre-COVID levels."

Sounds like filing is not a priority - i can understand their financial constraints leading to the very unusual idea of filing only w the SEC and not with the OTC.MARKETS.COM -otc. If they dont file w OTC they will lose many benefits which I've detailed over the years. Most investors will not find them if they dont file w OTC.

Never dealt w that strange situation before. They dont want to be what in the trade is known as an SEC reporting company because that is vastly more expensive- 8k's plus often 50-100pp 10Q's and audited 10k's etc and much closer governmental inspection/accountability etc and tight reporting constraints.

Since I've never seen their plan carried out before I'm not sure they can file only w the SEC if they only upgrade to pink current without being SEC reporting- as that phrase is used in the trade. Some of the info required of companies under the new rule is required through the OTCIQ form I've displayed on this board. Whether the SEC has a parallel OTCIQ form i dont know.

This is the 3rd large scale attack against low penny companies since 2010-i've detailed the other attacks and the documented political motivation behind those attacks on multiple stock boards and stocks.

Thanks for your efforts in providing some illumination.


(0)
(0)




Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us