Thanks. Well then, if it's 10 months, they might a

Thanks. Well then, if it's 10 months, they might as well just try again next year. I doubt either court will hold off the vote for almost a year, because there is already a vote next year.
The real issue then is there a way for them (the R/P Group) to get expedited review if they lose?
And, again, it really boils down to the R/P Group convincing the lower court that they are right. Who has the burden of proof here? Usually the plaintiff has the burden. Is that the case here, I don't know. Tie goes to the one who does not have the burden of proof.
The more I think about this, I can see why it appears the company is still moving forward on defending the Delaware state case.