Please, stop citing NDAs as a reason to withhold information. If in fact there are NDAs whose terms prohibit the disclosure of certain information, let Squires say so, and he can do what everyone else who relies on NDAs is required to do, shows us an the provision that prohibits disclosure. What you are doing is speculating that NDA’s exist and that their terms prohibit disclosure of the information being sought. You then point to these imaginary NDAs as a reason to prohibit asking a question. That’s not how NDA’s work, and that’s not how they’re dealt with by people who actually deal with them. I’ve drafted them, I’ve litigated them on both sides of the issue, I’ve overcome them and I’ve successfully defended them. I’ve also seen them lose their luster in the eyes of the courts, who are more and more willing to allow ways around them. But, that’s OK, disregard all that that because it’s an inconvenient fact that betrays the sham you keep playing. When you delete this post, you’ll know you’re intellectually and interested only in conducting a propaganda mill.
(0)
(0)
Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) Stock Research Links