So, the consensus seems to be that (1) the silence

So, the consensus seems to be that (1) the silence is unintentional, which means that management is incompetent, and cannot see what their silence is doing to the company, and SP, or (2) the silence is intentional, and the current harm to the company and SP makes no difference to management. If #1, then management should change, obviously. If #2, the question becomes what possible benefit could result from a failure to communicate with current or potential investors about the status of company activities (not necessarily COVID-related, either).

I have my own suspicions as to what is happening, but if I dare mention them, some on this board will question my motives, insinuate that I am just a basher who is not a shareholder, or make a more blunt attack. I have been on this board for 4+ months now, and in that entire time, I have seen no evidence of any revenue generated by GNBT from any source, just dilution of shares, and excuses.

I know we all hope that something positive is happening "behind the scenes," but there has to come a point when, for better or worse, we have to admit that the emperor has no clothes. If I am horribly, horribly, wrong, someone please take a picture of Joe's gown for the ball, and post it. Frankly, though, I don't think we will see another CC announced, because unless the CC will not involve taking any questions, the investors will storm the bastille. We all have seen on this board how Joe responds to anyone questioning his decisions.