I'm not arguing about any of what you said on this

I'm not arguing about any of what you said on this. But they had that valuation from before, so there is no reason why it is still not valid and with the 10 yr study, it should be and the fact they came back with it just recently as well.

That being said, we can't say it is not still there either. But, as for why they have not listed, I have no idea, I am as frustrated on this as anyone. We should be hearing something and honestly, there is no reason why we shouldn't be. 500+ million is still 500+ million, no matter how you cut it, so they should be listing.