JLang > "leads me to the conclusion that this was
Post# of 148190
If the threshold is a "preponderance of evidence", I agree. Difficult not to.
I have suspected the same for some time and concluded:
If they exclude LL, then the other threshold of "beyond a shadow of a doubt" will have been crossed.
What else makes sense? I see no other alternative. Do you?
No one should ever accept such budgetary nihilism and thank God there were only 5 perp-governors and not 50.
As you probably know, there is also this remote conspiracy that it would be advantageous for some to have the pandemic in full force in 2022 and 2024, bla bla bla, but this is not the board for that polemic.
I read that Janet tarnished her legacy via the opioid catastrophe. LL would be an opportunity to restore it.
She's even mentioned not prioritizing the p value.
So, what gives? Somebody got a choke collar on her?
It's a misguided consolation, but concertina wire and soldiers will not prevent variant #227 from breaching the hallowed halls on the Potomac. Surely they're not that blind or uninformed. Or maybe they are. Hello?
It's Spring. I have a lot of gardening to do. Rain all week, but then the weeds will come up easier.
btw, top estate tax in NY is 16%.