You clearly haven’t digested the results or list
Post# of 148126
Now factor in that 85%... EIGHTY FIVE PERCENT of the trial was severe.
Now factor in that there were VASTLY MORE of THE MOST FRAGILE POPULATION, 65+, in the treatment arm!
It’s like everyone was supposed to climb a hill, then climb a ladder at the top and plant a flag on top. Every that came close so had beautiful weather and friends helping them (Fauci, etc) and still couldn’t do more than tie the flag to the bottom of the ladder. Leronlimab gets both hands tied behind its back and sent up alone, at night, in the driving rain and mud, and managed to not only get up the hill, but halfway up the ladder, further than anyone else, and lays the flag down on a rung. Everyone screams and cries bc they didn’t tie it, with their two bound hands. GMAFB!!
You’re engaging in FUD; this trial design was OK. Not fantastic, but back LAST APRIL, almost one year ago, knowing what little was known, this all made sense.
Management has been BLINDED to the trial, the ONLY PEOPLE that could have seen the skew in populations to too much severe and not enough critical, and too many over 65 in treatment were the DSMC and possibly CRO.
GO BLAME THEM