3) Amongst all patients in mITT, the primary endpo
Post# of 148278
I was referring to this stat in the PR. Seems like with a few more death counts added to placebo it could have swung from "closer to stat significant" to "stat significant." This is for the the entire mITT which is 384, not just 62. Could have made a much stronger case.
Why do you have to be so combative? I'm just engaging in open discourse.