Is it better to know or to not know? In 2018 N

Is it better to know or to not know?

In 2018 Nader was criticized for not releasing enough information. He vowed to be as transparent as possible given the circumstances and he most certainly has. It may be to much information especially when things haven't solidified. An example being up to $100 million in financing when he didn't know whether the terms would be acceptable or not. But I thought it was nice to know there was a fallback position.

With the most recent CC there seemed to be two reasons behind it. Answering the critics about the lawsuit. Which I think was not worthy of an answer given how frivolous that lawsuit is.

Secondarily announcing the possible novel financing and a pathway to uplisting. It seems like most of the terms are in place and only a few things need to be hammered out.

Ordinarily financing and uplisting would be a positive and would not negatively affect the share price. But with the Night King of scumbag shorters piling on to aid his buddies in BP a downturn was inevitable. If it wasn't this CC it would have been anything else he could hang his hat on.

Personally, I know what we have, I know the potential and I know how close we are to achieving that potential so a temporary price fluctuation doesn't worry me. That being said I hope the shorts hang on to their positions until after a deal is finalized because I like to see them burn.