the problem is retail will never know what colludi
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 402)
Posted On: 12/13/2019 12:11:03 PM
the problem is retail will never know what colluding entities (Non Retail) does
one of the reasons NR relentlessly brutalizes by compressing an OTC targets' PPS downward
is because various colluding brokerage firms will use that as a way of not allowing their retail clients to *buy* when a targets' PPS falls below 25c .. 10c or 5c
retail client can only *sell* ..
who benefits at every turn .. the NR entities .. which is why .. years back .. once
i understood exactly what NR was doing .. i commented that they all collude
the true issue that NR has re: PTOI *shares* .. is significant ( read elevated risk to NR )
first and foremost .. and ironically imo .. due to how a (competitive) private company was funded in April 2019 (value of that funding and who backed the state's green bonds) is the *value* that can be attributed to *site*
oh the ironies there ..
second .. is the demand (that grows louder weekly) for this technology
third .. is the 10 year embedded * abusive * effort by NR re: P2O/PTOI
and again ironically .. that 10 year abusive effort is actually an asset for P2O investors
reminder .. most *targets* do not outlast .. let alone survive .. if they do so .. it
is almost always with a blown out I/O .. something P2O/PTOI does not have
fourth .. as i've noted pretty much since 2013/2014 .. NRs' dilemma remains
actual P2O investors .. many of whom (early/originals) have never sold one *share*
and have a CB (cost basis) far higher then NRs' illegally manipulated current PPS on PTOI
fifth .. with the material events' filed by RH specific to NF plant back operational
and Flagship back on line .. and buyer's feedstock processed .. the next material
event of significance imo will be buyer's funds' conveyed .. which is why the
timing of activity @ NF facility will be interesting to note .. input from buyer
is very clear about (upcoming) time frames en route .. even factoring aspects
one doesn't control .. it's pretty clear that by March 2020 .. initial (input) info should be known
sixth .. with material events' 8K'd by RH .. an UPSIDE DOWN NR fears not only
legit buying by *newbies* .. but fears more .. current P2O investors with a CB
far higher .. who haven't sold .. but depending on *material events* filed in 2020
.. may well decide to buy PTOI (add) to offset a CB of 70c to 80c PPS
legitimate buying is the last aspect an UPSIDE DOWN NR wants on PTOI
it's why *newbies* there get run off ..
==========
imo the majority of brokerage firms collude with NR .. regardless of whether their
clients are cash accts or margin accts .. which is why it's always so telling to see
when *patterns* change out
i'd say the next 6 months to 1 year will be telling ..
there is an entity (not retail) that has *increased* PTOI's *volume* in 2019
the ? is why .. i can speculate easily .. it's far better to have a cover price
@ X vs Y or Z
as of the EO November .. PTOI's YTD *volume* has surpassed the YTD *volume*
of 2018/2017/2016 and 2015
some here might remember the bookends of matched/mirrored *volume* on PTOI
36M and change >> 2013/2014
13M and change >> 2018/2017
my 2c is that the original embedded NR entity knows exactly what is en route
which imo will make for some pretty interesting weeks/months ahead
have to say .. 2019 has not been dull re: PTOI (stock)
4kids
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z680YJW4xY
one of the reasons NR relentlessly brutalizes by compressing an OTC targets' PPS downward
is because various colluding brokerage firms will use that as a way of not allowing their retail clients to *buy* when a targets' PPS falls below 25c .. 10c or 5c
retail client can only *sell* ..
who benefits at every turn .. the NR entities .. which is why .. years back .. once
i understood exactly what NR was doing .. i commented that they all collude
the true issue that NR has re: PTOI *shares* .. is significant ( read elevated risk to NR )
first and foremost .. and ironically imo .. due to how a (competitive) private company was funded in April 2019 (value of that funding and who backed the state's green bonds) is the *value* that can be attributed to *site*
oh the ironies there ..
second .. is the demand (that grows louder weekly) for this technology
third .. is the 10 year embedded * abusive * effort by NR re: P2O/PTOI
and again ironically .. that 10 year abusive effort is actually an asset for P2O investors
reminder .. most *targets* do not outlast .. let alone survive .. if they do so .. it
is almost always with a blown out I/O .. something P2O/PTOI does not have
fourth .. as i've noted pretty much since 2013/2014 .. NRs' dilemma remains
actual P2O investors .. many of whom (early/originals) have never sold one *share*
and have a CB (cost basis) far higher then NRs' illegally manipulated current PPS on PTOI
fifth .. with the material events' filed by RH specific to NF plant back operational
and Flagship back on line .. and buyer's feedstock processed .. the next material
event of significance imo will be buyer's funds' conveyed .. which is why the
timing of activity @ NF facility will be interesting to note .. input from buyer
is very clear about (upcoming) time frames en route .. even factoring aspects
one doesn't control .. it's pretty clear that by March 2020 .. initial (input) info should be known
sixth .. with material events' 8K'd by RH .. an UPSIDE DOWN NR fears not only
legit buying by *newbies* .. but fears more .. current P2O investors with a CB
far higher .. who haven't sold .. but depending on *material events* filed in 2020
.. may well decide to buy PTOI (add) to offset a CB of 70c to 80c PPS
legitimate buying is the last aspect an UPSIDE DOWN NR wants on PTOI
it's why *newbies* there get run off ..
==========
imo the majority of brokerage firms collude with NR .. regardless of whether their
clients are cash accts or margin accts .. which is why it's always so telling to see
when *patterns* change out
i'd say the next 6 months to 1 year will be telling ..
there is an entity (not retail) that has *increased* PTOI's *volume* in 2019
the ? is why .. i can speculate easily .. it's far better to have a cover price
@ X vs Y or Z
as of the EO November .. PTOI's YTD *volume* has surpassed the YTD *volume*
of 2018/2017/2016 and 2015
some here might remember the bookends of matched/mirrored *volume* on PTOI
36M and change >> 2013/2014
13M and change >> 2018/2017
my 2c is that the original embedded NR entity knows exactly what is en route
which imo will make for some pretty interesting weeks/months ahead
have to say .. 2019 has not been dull re: PTOI (stock)
4kids
Quote:
This creates a question, are all the shares that we bought through our brokerage
legitimate? I know that the shares I bought directly from JBI and have the certs in my safe are real. What could we do if we find out that we were sold fake shares? Also, there would be a cost to have a lawyer get involved when we want to put those certs back into our account.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z680YJW4xY
(2)
(0)