He said that in a shareholder email after the 6 WE
Post# of 148187
Therefore, z_smith's assessment is accurate, since the wording was at least misleading.
Sometimes, what he says simply doesn't add up:
Example, prognostic test: mid-year we were still in negotiations with interested parties; weeks later the test gets burried in the annual report (most probably since it is pretty much worthless at this stage, because that *** Pestell seems to have mislead about its status), while a poster here stated that already at the beginning of the year Paulson investors were told by Dr. Berger that nobody was interested in it from the start:
"That PCA test deal never happened. Dennis Berger told a friend of mine earlier in the year at a Paulson event that no one wants the PCA test. Hmmm."
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=560...z67dFWzJS5
And I still have NP in my ear saying in a video: "Dr. Pestell was spectacular in negotiations"... As a poster here said: WORDS HAVE MEANING
That is part of the bigger picture too (and one of the reasons why SP hasn't appreciated). Hence many are in "show me the money"-mode...