Your BIG mistake is listening to what the manipula

Message Board

Previous

| Next

Post# of 82690

(Total Views: 723)

Posted On: 10/30/2019 6:25:15 AM

Posted By: RDY2ROCK

Re: dogandcat #60484

Your BIG mistake is listening to what the manipulator bashers on lie-hub $SFOR board say, then bring it over here. Please leave that BS over there in the lie-hub cesspool! Just look at their posting history with multiple boards trashing stocks, so obvious what they do!

Mr. Kay went after BOTH -- PF and then MSFT, which was stated in the SEC filings when peeps take the time to read them. And the settlement amount for infringing on $SFOR "OOB/MFA" IP (not KE IP) was more than 9M! MSFT hasn't paid anything for KE IP that I've read to date.

Also keep in mind not ALL DoD and FED GOV devices (i.e. Mobile) are using MSFT Azure. McAfee would cover the larger footprint! McAfee is integrated with DoD and FED GOV overall devices/baselines. McAfee/ACS solution brief shows both KE and OOB/MFA IP for the Industry/Ecosystem ONLY Encrypted OOB/MFA solution!

15 JAN 2016 8K:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12855...for_8k.htm

Quote:
On March 28, 2013 , the Company initiated patent litigation against PhoneFactor, Inc., a subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation, for alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 7,870,599 (the "'599 Patent" . The Company filed a separate action against Microsoft Corporation based on its alleged infringement of the '599 Patent and two additional patents for out-of-band user authentication (U.S. Patent Nos.: 8,484,698 & 8,713,701). Both actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On January 15, 2016 , the litigation was settled and the parties executed a settlement agreement in the form of a Release and License Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Release and License Agreement are confidential except under limited conditions. As a consequence of the Release and License Agreement, the parties have moved to dismiss the action with prejudice, the Company has licensed the patents to Microsoft Corporation, and the Company will receive a non-disclosable one-time lump sum payment.

2016 10K:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12855...or_10k.htm

Quote:
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 28, 2013 , we initiated patent litigation against an outside party. As of March 31, 2015, the case was in full discovery, the pre-trial hearing was held, and the deliberations were continuing. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016 , the parties reached a settlement in the matter. As part of the settlement, the Company received a payment in January 2016 of $9,750,000 and incurred fees related to the settlement of $4,187,257 .

Best,
R2R