It seems the change outs are happening more freque
Post# of 72445
Quote:
It seems the change outs are happening more frequently. Do you believe that is because they are constantly trying to change trading patterns as they appear to be in such a deep hole here?
*short answer* .. YES
sorry about the delayed response Pete .. some days there are not enough hours in the day ..
imo it is vital for retail to understand that NR (non retail) always believes it can outlast *retail* and OTC mgmt teams
imo the reason is because of NRs' almost unlimited resources (colluding entities)
that can align on an as needed basis .. with little transparency or oversight ..
it's not difficult to see why *entities* would see OTC targets as a win/win *effort*
NR works cycles of money on take ups/take downs on OTC targets .. this effort
can run for days .. weeks .. months and in the case of IPIX *imo* .. 2 to 3 years
(@ 70c starting in September 2012)
so in IPIX's (CTIX) case .. with both mgmt and retail investors *lulled* into a false
sense of security because of 2 years of NR working those cycles of money ..
mgmt announces intent to uplist (2014) .. NR then sets up their final *take up* of significance (EO 2014)
and then NR does their hand off ..i.e. NRs' efforts of 2015 .. and we all know what that brought about
this is why volume (real/bogus and in between) .. imo is the key .. and it's why it is worth noting NRs' pattern change outs
no one does smoke and mirrors better then NR
so the key imo for retail with interest .. is discerning what is *real* and what is smoke
retail enters the *ring* with hands tied behind their back and blindfolded
mgmt *imo* has a very interesting window ahead of it .. if said window can be exploited
by mgmt .. (Sept 2019 to Dec 2019)
personally it's my belief that *NR* (non retail) learned something specific early into 2019
which is why we all saw the pattern change out on DRS %s .. starting March 1
into early May (2019) .. in early May we all got to see NR illegally orchestrate
IPIX *up ward* on *volume* done to negate the impact of IPI's material event
of 5.16.19
since then we've watched a *tightening* (imo) timeline on NRs' pattern change outs
once 9.7.19 passes .. IPIX's 52 week high drops dramatically .. day in .. week out
(remember 52 week low was *reset* to 7c on NRs' bogus volume injection on 12.31.18)
i'd expect *if able to* .. that NR gets ever more *volatile* .. but that volatility should be revealed via *volume*
IPIX currently
52-Week High
09/07/2018 0.5805
52-Week Low
12/31/2018 0.07
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
08/27/2019 -67.95%
Volume 0
Volume (10 day Average) 243,755
Volume (90 day Average) 545,405
IPIX (from COM 8.27.18)
52-Week High
12/06/2017 1.17
52-Week Low
06/21/2018 0.325
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
08/24/2018 -41.98%
Volume 111,105
Volume (10 day Average) 103,183
Volume (90 day Average) 204,551
Historical Short Volume Data for IPIX
Date Close High Low Volume Sht Vol % of Vol Shtd
Aug 27 NA NA NA 139,235 52,762 37.89% .. below 40%
Aug 26 NA NA NA 249,947 150,620 60.26%
Aug 23 NA NA NA 274,954 166,533 60.57%
Aug 22 NA NA NA 243,036 172,671 71.05%
Aug 21 NA NA NA 90,587 61,723 68.14%
Aug 20 NA NA NA 234,541 64,504 27.50% .. below 30%
Aug 19 NA NA NA 341,438 193,395 56.64%
Aug 16 NA NA NA 361,713 249,773 69.05%
Aug 15 NA NA NA 263,033 173,703 66.04%
Aug 14 NA NA NA 239,070 141,985 59.39%
Aug 13 NA NA NA 235,112 202,650 86.19%
Aug 12 NA NA NA 178,025 123,372 69.30%
Aug 09 NA NA NA 249,586 113,500 45.48% .. below 50%
Aug 08 NA NA NA 261,539 205,095 78.42%
Aug 07 NA NA NA 191,844 107,576 56.07%
Aug 06 NA NA NA 353,741 293,173 82.88%
Aug 05 NA NA NA 665,390 429,594 64.56%
Aug 02 NA NA NA 455,307 331,149 72.73%
Aug 01 NA NA NA 183,253 87,206 47.59% .. below 50%
Jul 31 NA NA NA 316,300 170,604 53.94%
Jul 30 NA NA NA 288,855 160,774 55.66%
Jul 29 NA NA NA 612,983 265,052 43.24%
and First Half of 2019 ..
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5473842
4kids
Quote:
It seems the change outs are happening more frequently. Do you believe that is because they are constantly trying to change trading patterns as they appear to be in such a deep hole here?
(8)
(0)