StrikeForce's Patent Appeal Decision PRESS RELEAS
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 522)
Posted On: 07/17/2019 10:25:50 AM
StrikeForce's Patent Appeal Decision
PRESS RELEASE UPDATED: FEB 20, 2019
EDISON, N.J., February 20, 2019 (Newswire.com) - StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (SFORQB: SFOR) – announces its Patent Appeal decision yesterday. We decided, with our lawyers, to continue the appeal and our decision will be based on the following, for which we don't have a decision as of today, but should have one soon. The decision is based on the following:
Yesterday, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued what is called a “Rule 36” decision, affirming the district court’s order in StrikeForce v. SecureAuth, dismissing StrikeForce’s lawsuit on the grounds of 35 U.S.C. § 101, a statute that concerns what types of inventions are patentable. Because it issued a “Rule 36” decision, the Federal Circuit panel was not required to explain its reasoning, beyond merely saying that all three judges on the panel agree that the district court should be affirmed. We obviously disagree with the panel’s ruling, and are disappointed in the outcome. We are currently considering our options, among which are: (1) asking the panel to rehear the case; (2) asking the entire Federal Circuit (including all twelve active judges on the court, and not just this panel of three judges) to rehear the case; or (3) petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.
Thank you for all of your support and when we know what is next, we will announce it to you all.
Media Contact Information
Mark Kay
610-246-4276
PRESS RELEASE UPDATED: FEB 20, 2019
EDISON, N.J., February 20, 2019 (Newswire.com) - StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (SFORQB: SFOR) – announces its Patent Appeal decision yesterday. We decided, with our lawyers, to continue the appeal and our decision will be based on the following, for which we don't have a decision as of today, but should have one soon. The decision is based on the following:
Yesterday, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued what is called a “Rule 36” decision, affirming the district court’s order in StrikeForce v. SecureAuth, dismissing StrikeForce’s lawsuit on the grounds of 35 U.S.C. § 101, a statute that concerns what types of inventions are patentable. Because it issued a “Rule 36” decision, the Federal Circuit panel was not required to explain its reasoning, beyond merely saying that all three judges on the panel agree that the district court should be affirmed. We obviously disagree with the panel’s ruling, and are disappointed in the outcome. We are currently considering our options, among which are: (1) asking the panel to rehear the case; (2) asking the entire Federal Circuit (including all twelve active judges on the court, and not just this panel of three judges) to rehear the case; or (3) petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.
Thank you for all of your support and when we know what is next, we will announce it to you all.
Media Contact Information
Mark Kay
610-246-4276
(4)
(1)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
WORDS TO LIVE BY:
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Get .... PrivacyLok https://cyberidguard.com/
Try SafeVchat: https://cyberidguard.com/
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice.
Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any stock.
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Get .... PrivacyLok https://cyberidguard.com/
Try SafeVchat: https://cyberidguard.com/
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice.
Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any stock.
Scroll down for more posts ▼