I appreciate your point of view... but...@ just
Post# of 43064
Quote:
I appreciate your point of view... but...@ just under .03 CB... for me...it's not too far a stretch to be sure...but I've played my hand at this point in time. The same could be said for the ask...and if L2 was to be believed ..within 2K or so..we are sitting @ .03 .
this is why i posted *there* the volume transacted since last July (pps 008 to 08c)
it's 22M and change .. what is different this time around .. are the 3 bids that
have flashed over the last 2 months (one reason why i document) so all with interest
can check for themselves at what price point the 300k/500k/600k *showed*
.. the other fact that is different this time around .. pertains to both ETRF and
OTCX on *bid* .. both have been signed off of .. since May (suspect issues
re: compliance .. there is a very large share wise LT investor whose GTCs
were always utilized by Etrade once they expired .. highly doubt he was alone)
as for the ask .. you have been around long enough to know the ask is NRs'
dirty little secret re: PTOI (the stock) .. OTCX (decoy) blocks CONstantly ..
NITE blocks .. ETRF blocks .. CDEL blocks .. CSTI blocks ..
Quote:
And yet, while the longs...given that they'll just go down with the ship because they're so far under at this point...it makes little sense to sell. The question then turns obvious...what is going on with PTO ...with these supposed options to either produce, sell, license, partner... communicate... and NONE of it (beyond filing) is happening.
that is exactly what i've noted for years (discovered it myself in late 2012) .. very specific *longs* .. long ago made their choice to remain invested in P2O
i've noted the reasons why .. 100s of times .. as for what RH and BoD are doing
we can all speculate .. but leaking isn't in the mix .. and i understand why that
causes frustration .. we all have our own barometers .. for many early investors
it remains the founder .. as for what RH and BoD are doing .. you like me have
no idea .. *that none of it (beyond filing) is happening*
this is just one reason why *volume* matters .. lack of it reveals .. non lack of it reveals ..
Quote:
I no longer care about who holds what...for how long...what value can be attributed to that "asset" ...a gross naked short position...or anything other than what Heddle communicates to shareholders that is the least bit positive...without having to guess..or hypothesize ... or banter about simply because his reluctance to communicate apparently seems to be his only "ace in the hole".
not too surprising .. most only care about themselves .. as for the *asset*
the asset remains .. an enviable I/O (Float) .. founder's tech in an emerging sector
actual investors .. a CEO and BoD with skin in the game ..
i've noted since 2014 (year after RH installed and P2O wrested back) that
RH's communication skills needed improvement
but also noted that by then everyone who wanted out was gone (Jan 2014
and Oct 2014) .. again not to put too fine a point on it .. but PTOI (stock)
has been *kept* mostly @ 6c since January 2014 .. and @ sub 5c since October 2014
Quote:
It's inappropriate to run a public company in this manner ...I'm sorry...while I respect the guy for being self-made...and a spirited entrepreneur..AND successful in business....he should otherwise be passing this off to someone who really wants to be supported by his shareholder base and at the very least communicate ...beyond filing...what is going on with this (our) Company!! This is BS...and anyone who wishes can C &P this into an email to the company...and inform the Board..how some genuine supporters of the concept...the field..the environment...and this Company...feel about the treatment and investment.
it's the OTC .. which makes it fungible .. as you and others should know
there are many P2O investors who email the CEO regularly stressing the
importance communication .. but the CEO like the BoD are highly successful
which counters for some (not all) .. we can all speculate as to why .. that said
buying PTOI shares on the open market doesn't benefit P2O .. those who've
funded the company since 2013 .. can be noted easily and they all have one
aspect in common
Quote:
While we know why nobody is selling...the question we should all be asking Heddle is why aren't you encouraging your base to reinvest!?? Pathetic! IMO
it's pretty clear that until RH gives folks a reason to buy .. they won't .. unless
of course it's a trading crew trying to enter .. which based on PMs rec'd .. i
certainly won't rule out .. that would be truly ironic .. because yep crew would
have to actually hit the ask and move up their bid/s .. (NR is blocking 3c for
a reason which should be obvious to anyone who has watched PTOI for years)
what won't surprise me is if or when RH gives *new or even early eyes* a reason to buy or add PTOI .. it will be because of a fait accompli
just me perhaps .. but dangling carrots isn't something *any one* wants to read
bottom line for many (not all) actual investors .. is P2O files .. it is clear there is a reason why RH & BoD remain *compliant* on the fungible OTC
looking at what is being done in Indiana (evolution of and time frame of)
no one can rule out anything ..
again lines long since drawn in the sand .. years ago (2013)
4kids