We'll get the details soon enough I'm sure, but al
Post# of 75011
They want to be certain they get it right the first time and don't get tripped up by moving ahead to quickly on knee jerk impulses.
I'm betting that since he wasn't a director, and therefore his pay arrangement as an employee didn't have to be reported, they very likely just altered it. They can make him whole on more of a commission based arrangement. It seems highly likely to me that they wanted to avoid repeating what they experienced earlier with John Blackington.
Not that John wasn't smart and experienced, but you either butter the bread or you don't. I think management has gotten very good at something I stated earlier, and that's thinking on their feet and reacting quickly to changing situations.
They are keeping shareholder value at the top of the priority list. My confidence has not been shaken by the wild LieHub-variety rumors being plastered all over message boards. I fully expected it.