the last aspect NR has ever wanted is an educated retail investor
understanding how *legal* shorting works .. makes it easy to see how
legal can turn abusive very quickly against NR .. again it isn't *retail*
that shorts (legal or abusive) OTC companies ..
crews work cycles of money until they go upside down so significantly
that they literally have no choice .. hence the last *hand off* of 2014 into 2015
.. anyone wanting to see how *one* specific crew worked CTIX (2014) can note
the interaction *there* via post 76926 on 11.5.14 (this crew overlaps .. meaning
one side works the cycle up .. the other side works the cycle down) .. and what
is really revealing is who is in this specific crew and when the last post went off
( 1.26.15 ) .. it doesn't take too much time to note where this *one crew* spent
significant time ( overlaps to this day on 2 OTC 10 year survivors .. both have
aspects in common .. actual investors .. aware mgmt .. enviable Share Structures
and *product* with significant potential) .. note the volume algo overlap of 98
on the day of X's first post and the day CTIX had their all time high of $4.93
NR needs to not only *control* aspects .. it always has to sling FUD .. any effort
at any time to get actual investors to *sell* .. the more desperate NR gets the
more effort gets put towards the *dilemma*
one of these days .. when i have the hours to dedicate to it .. i will post out
CTIX/IPIX's *volume* YTD for 2014/2015/2016/2017 and 2018 .. it is crystal
clear that NR *failed* to part actual investors of significance out of CTIX ..
it's why in 2016 .. there wasn't one *volume* day of 1M~ traded on CTIX
regulars on this SMB got to see just who posted *relentlessly* in 2018 about
*sells* when NR dumped almost 55M IPIX *shares* .. they didn't hold
mgmt diluted over that time just over 13M .. have one of the *whiners*
explain how the first 8 months of 2018 .. IPIX had about 4M~ (avg) in *volume*
but had 13M~ (avg) in *volume* per month for the last 4 months of 2018
*cant* be done without illegally manipulating IPIX *shares*
i noted on 9.14.18 after IPIX had the unusual occurrence of back to back 1M~ volume days (9.12. & 9.13 after the K was filed AH's on 9.11.18) .. that NR would
have to *inject* volume on IPIX .. again NR *cant* have IPIX volume cliff diving
in alignment with sub tiers CONstantly *posting* about selling and dilution ..
when the *volume* YTD didn't support that hourly reiteration
it's why two weeks ago that again became the *mantra* for the sub tiers
it's why this site saw *effort* back in March of this year
no one here knows what NR *learned* back in mid to late February .. but pretty
clear *info* was ascertained .. it's why previous patterns changed out for 2 mos
and 2 days .. which ended just in time for the mini test of Friday May 3rd, 2019
feels like a year ago some days .. but that *test* stopped out @ 19c then (closed
from memory so i may be off @ 17c)
that was 2 weeks ago this past Friday .. since then NR has pumped thru *volume*
of 17,066,398 over 10 trading days .. think about that and spot the obvious below
besides the electronic footprint of 2014/2015 and last week noted in previous post
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5440290
of the 11 times IPIX/CTIX has had *volume* over 2M~
4 of the 11 times were in the last 2 weeks
priors were . .
3 in 2012 (Sept/Dec) .. Sept 2012 was the kickoff for NRs' CTIX cycles of money
1 in 2014 (Dec) .. (after the 4M~ then record setting *volume* day and handoff)
2 in 2015 (Jan .. note above *msg* there and Aug for the take down of CTIX)
1 in 2018 (October)
and of course ..
4 in 2019 (all done in May after mini test and pattern change out)
this isn't rocket science but it is math .. this is why the *desperation* is so palpable
by NRs' *entities* working various SMBs
4kids
understanding how *legal* shorting works .. makes it easy to see how
legal can turn abusive very quickly against NR .. again it isn't *retail*
that shorts (legal or abusive) OTC companies ..
crews work cycles of money until they go upside down so significantly
that they literally have no choice .. hence the last *hand off* of 2014 into 2015
.. anyone wanting to see how *one* specific crew worked CTIX (2014) can note
the interaction *there* via post 76926 on 11.5.14 (this crew overlaps .. meaning
one side works the cycle up .. the other side works the cycle down) .. and what
is really revealing is who is in this specific crew and when the last post went off
( 1.26.15 ) .. it doesn't take too much time to note where this *one crew* spent
significant time ( overlaps to this day on 2 OTC 10 year survivors .. both have
aspects in common .. actual investors .. aware mgmt .. enviable Share Structures
and *product* with significant potential) .. note the volume algo overlap of 98
on the day of X's first post and the day CTIX had their all time high of $4.93
11/05/2014 3.095 3.17 2.84 2.91 983,859
12/12/2014 4.805 4.93 4.66 4.8 981,392
01/26/2015 3.545 3.64 3.28 3.55 694,776
NR needs to not only *control* aspects .. it always has to sling FUD .. any effort
at any time to get actual investors to *sell* .. the more desperate NR gets the
more effort gets put towards the *dilemma*
one of these days .. when i have the hours to dedicate to it .. i will post out
CTIX/IPIX's *volume* YTD for 2014/2015/2016/2017 and 2018 .. it is crystal
clear that NR *failed* to part actual investors of significance out of CTIX ..
it's why in 2016 .. there wasn't one *volume* day of 1M~ traded on CTIX
regulars on this SMB got to see just who posted *relentlessly* in 2018 about
*sells* when NR dumped almost 55M IPIX *shares* .. they didn't hold
mgmt diluted over that time just over 13M .. have one of the *whiners*
explain how the first 8 months of 2018 .. IPIX had about 4M~ (avg) in *volume*
but had 13M~ (avg) in *volume* per month for the last 4 months of 2018
*cant* be done without illegally manipulating IPIX *shares*
i noted on 9.14.18 after IPIX had the unusual occurrence of back to back 1M~ volume days (9.12. & 9.13 after the K was filed AH's on 9.11.18) .. that NR would
have to *inject* volume on IPIX .. again NR *cant* have IPIX volume cliff diving
in alignment with sub tiers CONstantly *posting* about selling and dilution ..
when the *volume* YTD didn't support that hourly reiteration
it's why two weeks ago that again became the *mantra* for the sub tiers
it's why this site saw *effort* back in March of this year
no one here knows what NR *learned* back in mid to late February .. but pretty
clear *info* was ascertained .. it's why previous patterns changed out for 2 mos
and 2 days .. which ended just in time for the mini test of Friday May 3rd, 2019
feels like a year ago some days .. but that *test* stopped out @ 19c then (closed
from memory so i may be off @ 17c)
that was 2 weeks ago this past Friday .. since then NR has pumped thru *volume*
of 17,066,398 over 10 trading days .. think about that and spot the obvious below
Date Open High Low Close Volume
05/17/2019 0.355 0.36 0.244 0.25 2,651,634
05/16/2019 0.213 0.33 0.21 0.32 4,413,783
05/15/2019 0.2 0.2099 0.19 0.2 237,776
05/14/2019 0.183 0.215 0.183 0.197 880,776
05/13/2019 0.195 0.2045 0.171 0.176 668,718
05/10/2019 0.287 0.32 0.2039 0.21 2,377,716
05/09/2019 0.3515 0.3558 0.284 0.292 863,112
05/08/2019 0.435 0.4351 0.3103 0.345 2,366,980
05/07/2019 0.2352 0.423 0.2205 0.417 2,513,988
05/06/2019 0.173 0.25 0.1595 0.2205 760,633
besides the electronic footprint of 2014/2015 and last week noted in previous post
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5440290
of the 11 times IPIX/CTIX has had *volume* over 2M~
4 of the 11 times were in the last 2 weeks
priors were . .
3 in 2012 (Sept/Dec) .. Sept 2012 was the kickoff for NRs' CTIX cycles of money
1 in 2014 (Dec) .. (after the 4M~ then record setting *volume* day and handoff)
2 in 2015 (Jan .. note above *msg* there and Aug for the take down of CTIX)
1 in 2018 (October)
and of course ..
4 in 2019 (all done in May after mini test and pattern change out)
this isn't rocket science but it is math .. this is why the *desperation* is so palpable
by NRs' *entities* working various SMBs
4kids
Quote:
Why would anyone who has the best interests at heart for this company and this message board continually try to stir up a food fight about whether information that many of us want to read should be withheld from people?
6
1
