I agree with your post here, sjacobs. I also thin
Post# of 154851
(Total Views: 319)
Posted On: 05/13/2019 10:27:13 PM
I agree with your post here, sjacobs. I also think that it’s highly likely that things are developing in real time on several fronts, and the optimization problem management faces would be difficult or impossible to be transparent about. For example, maybe they’ve got a PCa deal all but locked up for decent money... sounds great, right? Well, what if on another front, a BP wants a big strategic partnership with an equity investment... but wants data on other indications first AND wants to keep the PCa test to improve future cash flow? The plot could get thick quickly.
Not really a response to you, just something I’ve been thinking about for a bit. It helps keep me patient when I remember how complicated - and crucial - the current situation is likely to be. Not bad at all, just very complicated and at this point, the strategy chosen may be the single largest determinant of the value the company will eventually recognize. I think we’ll hear something very soon, but I’m willing to be very patient at this juncture.
Thanks to all who still attempt to keep the other board in check. I gave up and resorted to hoping the traders eventually get caught with their pants down when the tide goes out.
Not really a response to you, just something I’ve been thinking about for a bit. It helps keep me patient when I remember how complicated - and crucial - the current situation is likely to be. Not bad at all, just very complicated and at this point, the strategy chosen may be the single largest determinant of the value the company will eventually recognize. I think we’ll hear something very soon, but I’m willing to be very patient at this juncture.
Thanks to all who still attempt to keep the other board in check. I gave up and resorted to hoping the traders eventually get caught with their pants down when the tide goes out.
(0)
(0)