It looks like they settled: Pursuant to Federal

It looks like they settled:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (“Strikeforce”) and Defendants OneSpan, Inc. (formerly VASCO Data Security International, Inc.) and OneSpan North America, Inc. (formerly Vasco Data Security, Inc.) (collectively, “Defendants”) have stipulated that (1) all claims brought or that could have been brought in this action by the StrikeForce are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) all defenses and counterclaims brought or that could have been brought in this action by the Defendants are dismissed without prejudice.
StrikeForce has further stipulated that Strikeforce, on behalf of itself and any successorsin-interest to U.S. Patent 8,484,698 (“the ’698 patent”) and U.S. Patent 8,713,701 (“the ’701patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”), hereby unconditionally and irrevocably covenants not to assert at any time any claim of patent infringement including direct infringement, contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement against Defendants and/or any of their parents, subsidiaries, successors-in-interest, customers, or end users, under any claim of the Asserted Patents, any parents of the Asserted Patents, or any continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, reexaminations, reissues, certificates and foreign counterparts to the Asserted Patents or parents of the Asserted Patents.
Based on the foregoing stipulations, StrikeForce and Defendants jointly move for an order dismissing this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.