To the lower courts...SFOR's product/patent it is

To the lower courts...SFOR's product/patent it is not abstract! Since SA's attorney kept it "third grade" while defending SA...maybe SFOR can dumb it down to those that don't get it either. Yes. it CAN be abstract, but what SFOR has/does makes it not abstract. Abstract would be a bank calling a customer on the phone to verify they wanted a transaction to occur. Very basic, indeed! However, SFOR has software (or a mechanism) that is used to make sure that when the banker calls, the customer isn't someone else that is portraying to be the actual customer. SFOR takes the fraud (or portrayal) out of it with their product. A very simple case is Ferris Bueller...he faked out the school's principal by sounding like his dad when the principal asked for his dad. In the world of transactions, software is needed to combat the fraudsters. SFOR's got it with valid patents. SFOR takes the abstract out of it, and makes transactions more secure.