SFOR Patent deemed Abstract in the eyes of the Low
Post# of 82686
(Total Views: 644)
Posted On: 03/29/2019 8:04:59 AM
SFOR Patent deemed Abstract in the eyes of the Lower Court Justice System.
Great Article Gimli, that reading article lead me to another Entitled :
Revised Patent Eligibility Guidance Effectively Defines What is an Abstract Idea
https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/01/04/patent-...id=104754/
SFOR has won two IPR''s within the USPTO. And at least I had thought this should have been considered in our Lower Court and Federal Appeals court decesions. But as a Laymen when it comes to Patent Law, I was mistaken.
As an IPR is only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications.
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-pro...tes-review
and what SFOR/R&G are currently Fighting is an argument of Abstract Idea.
Many here that have not served in the Military may not know the Military has it's own Justice System the UCMJ or Uniform Code of Military Justice
Still the whole thing ( Last 2 Court procedings (District & Federal Court of Appeals) reminds me of a book I read while Stationed in Taiwan while in the USAF.
The Title of which was " Military Justice is to Justice as Military Music is to Music
I'm sure Ropes and Gray is impatiently waiting the chance to Bring SFOR's Case before the U.S. Supreme Court at such a Critical Time when Alice 101, while Alice 101 is still influx. As winning their case before the Supreme Court may have an insurmountable weigh in on the Supream Couurts decesion Alice 101. I'M
With the Supream Court seeing how the District Court and Court of Appeals listened to Lame Defence Arguments and Decided in favor of the Defendant Secure Auth.
This all goes back to what I said after the Appeals Court Loss
Video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bqD5TI9SmQPY...p=drivesdk
Great Article Gimli, that reading article lead me to another Entitled :
Revised Patent Eligibility Guidance Effectively Defines What is an Abstract Idea
https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/01/04/patent-...id=104754/
SFOR has won two IPR''s within the USPTO. And at least I had thought this should have been considered in our Lower Court and Federal Appeals court decesions. But as a Laymen when it comes to Patent Law, I was mistaken.
As an IPR is only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications.
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-pro...tes-review
and what SFOR/R&G are currently Fighting is an argument of Abstract Idea.
Many here that have not served in the Military may not know the Military has it's own Justice System the UCMJ or Uniform Code of Military Justice
Still the whole thing ( Last 2 Court procedings (District & Federal Court of Appeals) reminds me of a book I read while Stationed in Taiwan while in the USAF.
The Title of which was " Military Justice is to Justice as Military Music is to Music
I'm sure Ropes and Gray is impatiently waiting the chance to Bring SFOR's Case before the U.S. Supreme Court at such a Critical Time when Alice 101, while Alice 101 is still influx. As winning their case before the Supreme Court may have an insurmountable weigh in on the Supream Couurts decesion Alice 101. I'M
With the Supream Court seeing how the District Court and Court of Appeals listened to Lame Defence Arguments and Decided in favor of the Defendant Secure Auth.
This all goes back to what I said after the Appeals Court Loss
Video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bqD5TI9SmQPY...p=drivesdk
(7)
(0)