So you are saying the CEO who told the Court the Defendant had posters banned on da Hub, and said in 2014 they had 2 of 3 items needed for a recovery permit on Area 2, and said in 2017 that was the year is going to be straight with me about why the Bureau doesn’t accept his definition of a wreck site?
I bet you also think Spain is ready to make a deal just as soon as Tinkerbell finds da Motherlode, huh?