thx for the read alan ..
imo algos reveal their own pattern .. as has been evident re: IPIX
specific to *reporting* and NRs' *effort* re: volume maintenance
note the reason for *recent interest* .. here ..
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=537...z5hmk1x43D
and remember last round re: 10/90 day volume avgs ..
here's IPIX volume avgs .. after NRs' inability to inject *liquidity* last week
into a manipulated mess of NRs' own making .. by squeezing out every ounce
of liquidity via relentless PPS compression over the last 4 years ..
as odd as it may be for some to digest .. if NR had been successful in significantly
parting actual Innovation Pharma investors from their IPIX *shares* ..
IPIX's volume wouldn't be so *painful* for NR (non retail) to work these days
and IPIX's *vol avgs* would be significantly higher than they are
IPIX Volume 0
Volume (10 day Average) 485,164
Volume (90 day Average) 547,518
4kids
U.S. SEC to review stock trading rules in big potential shakeup
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-regula...SKBN1QP2BT
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is launching a review of the main set of rules governing stock trading, opening the door to the biggest potential changes in a decade-and-a-half, the head of the agency said on Friday.
The possible changes are aimed at making it easier to trade illiquid stocks, making more trading information available to investors, and improving the speed and quality of public data feeds needed for trading.
The SEC in 2005 adopted a broad framework called Regulation National Market System that was largely aimed at ensuring retail investors get the best price possible and preventing trades from being executed at prices that are inferior to bids and offers displayed on other trading venues.
Since then, faster, more sophisticated technology has put a bigger focus on rapid-fire, high-speed trading. There has also been an influx of new electronic stock exchanges, fragmenting liquidity and increasing costs for brokers around exchange connectivity and market data needed to fuel algorithmic trading.
“It is clear that the market challenges we faced in the early 2000s are not the same as the issues that we confront over a decade later,” Jay Clayton, chairman of the SEC, said at an event in New York.
To get a better grasp of current market issues, the SEC held a series of roundtable discussions with industry experts last year that led to potential rule-making recommendations around thinly-traded securities, combating retail fraud, and market data and market access, Clayton said.
Original post by Schken
Go IPIX!!!
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/873...z5hmmGTh9L
imo algos reveal their own pattern .. as has been evident re: IPIX
specific to *reporting* and NRs' *effort* re: volume maintenance
note the reason for *recent interest* .. here ..
Mar 08 NA NA NA 219,203 146,016 66.61%
Mar 07 NA NA NA 226,552 213,443 94.21%
Mar 06 NA NA NA 466,807 368,784 79.00%
Mar 05 NA NA NA 371,973 258,296 69.44%
Mar 04 NA NA NA 475,644 301,557 63.40%
Mar 01 NA NA NA 355,785 301,825 84.83%
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=537...z5hmk1x43D
and remember last round re: 10/90 day volume avgs ..
here's IPIX volume avgs .. after NRs' inability to inject *liquidity* last week
into a manipulated mess of NRs' own making .. by squeezing out every ounce
of liquidity via relentless PPS compression over the last 4 years ..
as odd as it may be for some to digest .. if NR had been successful in significantly
parting actual Innovation Pharma investors from their IPIX *shares* ..
IPIX's volume wouldn't be so *painful* for NR (non retail) to work these days
and IPIX's *vol avgs* would be significantly higher than they are
IPIX Volume 0
Volume (10 day Average) 485,164
Volume (90 day Average) 547,518
4kids
U.S. SEC to review stock trading rules in big potential shakeup
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-regula...SKBN1QP2BT
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is launching a review of the main set of rules governing stock trading, opening the door to the biggest potential changes in a decade-and-a-half, the head of the agency said on Friday.
The possible changes are aimed at making it easier to trade illiquid stocks, making more trading information available to investors, and improving the speed and quality of public data feeds needed for trading.
The SEC in 2005 adopted a broad framework called Regulation National Market System that was largely aimed at ensuring retail investors get the best price possible and preventing trades from being executed at prices that are inferior to bids and offers displayed on other trading venues.
Since then, faster, more sophisticated technology has put a bigger focus on rapid-fire, high-speed trading. There has also been an influx of new electronic stock exchanges, fragmenting liquidity and increasing costs for brokers around exchange connectivity and market data needed to fuel algorithmic trading.
“It is clear that the market challenges we faced in the early 2000s are not the same as the issues that we confront over a decade later,” Jay Clayton, chairman of the SEC, said at an event in New York.
To get a better grasp of current market issues, the SEC held a series of roundtable discussions with industry experts last year that led to potential rule-making recommendations around thinly-traded securities, combating retail fraud, and market data and market access, Clayton said.
Original post by Schken
Go IPIX!!!
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/873...z5hmmGTh9L
2
