On one hand you're saying you learned nothing that

On one hand you're saying you learned nothing that is inside information, on the other hand you say I'm speculating because I didn't pay. I've stated that I made similar visits without ever asking for money, and while I gained confidence about the company, I learned nothing that I didn't know previously. I know I'm speculating, but I wouldn't need to if the company were more open about what they're doing. If they told you, it might not fall into what would be called inside information, but why couldn't or shouldn't they be telling everyone.

I don't know precisely who all that contributed are, but I know some at least who are not supporting the reverse split, so your trip didn't change their opinions on that. If you know that patents will be approved by a date certain, I don't know why the company can't tell us so, likewise if they know they won't get approvals.

One problem I had with what I saw in visiting companies was that in spite of my increase confidence, the companies were often not successful long term. They presented themselves well, but success has been limited, and some no longer are in business. Therefore, I place little faith on such visits.

I very much regret Cherry's losses after going to the expense of attending one of the presentation the company made, and providing it to us. I believe it added to what many believed about the company, yet Cherry sold out at a big loss. I've only lost when I sold for a tax loss, but I'm down substantially on paper. At this point I intend to hang on and watch what happens, but that could certainly change in the future. As for funding visits, etc, I'd rather purchase stock with the money I'd be spending.

Gary