I would like to engage in this convo but let’s t
Post# of 32629
(Total Views: 389)
Posted On: 12/21/2018 12:07:16 PM
I would like to engage in this convo but let’s try and make it short and sweet. I love having this discussion about the RS and when shareholders say we will get killed when the RS happens. When I ask the following question, ok explain to me what scenario will play out, but I always present my logic first, no one knows how to answer me.
Let me ask you this. When the Pre14c happened and we tanked from .44 - .16, who benefited from this drop? The shorts. Who sold during this drop? Not me or any long I know who has been here since 2016 and we hold shares as low as .05. Another question is what happened to the short interest when we traded 3MM shares. Here’s another question, who owns a boat load of shares under .40 cents that can tank the stock? We know Kodiak, Oceanside are gone and they were the debt holders. EMA is still in litigation. What has been the vwap over the last 12 months so the real question aside from some 2017 longs who owns shares lower than .27 which is the lowest shares that can be exercised as per the fins?
Now let’s go back to the RS and let’s say we consolidate until then at .25. We do a 1:20 making the stock price 5$. Why would the stock price go down after that. What’s the logic for a long who owns under .25 or now 5$ which is the same value to sell. Why would a trader sell who bought in at .25? Why would the 3rd party who may exercise their warrants at an average price of .27 sell at 5$ at a loss? Why would anyone sell at a loss in January after tax loss season?
Why is someone selling after the RS. If the public offering happens pre RS or after RS why do you think they will sell for a loss. I have yet to hear a logical reply. Hopefully you can shed some light on this subject. Also when you give your comparison of companies, did they have the following catalysts coming:
- V3
- notifiMD
- Microsoft
- Salesforce
- cloud based contract #1
- cloud based contract #2
- update on notifiEDU
- notifiLive Facebook
- notifiLive Instagram
- sound concepts increasing user base with potentially 50MM+ in revs
- SAP
- slidely
- and so on....
TIA
Let me ask you this. When the Pre14c happened and we tanked from .44 - .16, who benefited from this drop? The shorts. Who sold during this drop? Not me or any long I know who has been here since 2016 and we hold shares as low as .05. Another question is what happened to the short interest when we traded 3MM shares. Here’s another question, who owns a boat load of shares under .40 cents that can tank the stock? We know Kodiak, Oceanside are gone and they were the debt holders. EMA is still in litigation. What has been the vwap over the last 12 months so the real question aside from some 2017 longs who owns shares lower than .27 which is the lowest shares that can be exercised as per the fins?
Now let’s go back to the RS and let’s say we consolidate until then at .25. We do a 1:20 making the stock price 5$. Why would the stock price go down after that. What’s the logic for a long who owns under .25 or now 5$ which is the same value to sell. Why would a trader sell who bought in at .25? Why would the 3rd party who may exercise their warrants at an average price of .27 sell at 5$ at a loss? Why would anyone sell at a loss in January after tax loss season?
Why is someone selling after the RS. If the public offering happens pre RS or after RS why do you think they will sell for a loss. I have yet to hear a logical reply. Hopefully you can shed some light on this subject. Also when you give your comparison of companies, did they have the following catalysts coming:
- V3
- notifiMD
- Microsoft
- Salesforce
- cloud based contract #1
- cloud based contract #2
- update on notifiEDU
- notifiLive Facebook
- notifiLive Instagram
- sound concepts increasing user base with potentially 50MM+ in revs
- SAP
- slidely
- and so on....
TIA
(16)
(0)Verb Technology Company, Inc (VERB) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼